Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 184.108.40.206 , register , free tools , login , search , subscribe , help , library , announcements , recent posts , open posts Pubcon Website
Textarea form width and height Brett_Tabke msg:614896 12:43 pm on Feb 8, 2001 (gmt 0) Any standards on what you should use for width and height of textarea's? I can't find so much as a recommendation anywhere.
tedster msg:614897 6:45 am on Feb 9, 2001 (gmt 0)
I've never seen anything like that either Brett. I think that both columns and rows would vary considerably in specific contexts.
Your question brings up a related area for me. I've read that the HTML 4.0 specs don't include WRAP for textarea.
Netscape and MSIE both list WRAP = HARD ¦ SOFT ¦ OFF in their guides. (Hard sends the visible linebreaks to the server and soft does not). These seem very useful to me, and I wouldn't like to see them vanish.
Does anyone know why HTML 4 doesn't include the WRAP attribute?
sugarkane msg:614898 11:58 am on Feb 9, 2001 (gmt 0)
AFAIK it's never been in the recommendations - I think it's a Netscape extension? grnidone msg:614899 4:02 pm on Feb 9, 2001 (gmt 0)
Joe Burns says make a text area column no wider than 30. Cuz that's the way he likes it.
But Ted's right. I haven't seen a "recommended" size. And I have always used "wrap=virtual"...
tedster msg:614900 7:13 pm on Feb 9, 2001 (gmt 0)
Looks like this area is a side skirmish in the browser wars, started back when Netscape was dominant.
I read on
idocs.com [ idocs.com] that Virtual and Physical were Netscape's proposed values for HTML 3.0. Soft and hard, respectively were the MSIE proposal.
Then I read on
Webreference.com [ webreference.com] that Netscape now supports only hard¦soft and MSIE supports physical¦virtual. That's a weird reversal!
I've also read that recent browsers only support the hard¦soft values. The W3C recommendation is nothing.
Can't say I've tested any of this, though, and I just tried to research it and only ended up more confused.
Does anyone have a definitive word?