homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.163.84.199
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Advertising / Affiliates
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: eljefe3 & skibum

Affiliates Forum

    
FTC Charges Companies for Affiliate Spam
You are responsible for your affiliates!
JeremyL




msg:541354
 5:41 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

[clickz.com...]

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has charged seven companies with violating anti-porn provisions of the CAN-SPAM Act as a result of activity by their marketing affiliates, the commission announced yesterday.

Ouch, I didn't realize this could happen. The question is, how can companies protect themselves from rouge affiliates?

 

wrgvt




msg:541355
 6:56 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

It sounds like these were adult companies that hoped using affiliates to send adult spam might shield them from the law. And were wrong.

I seriously doubt that if your company is selling blue widgets (and no adult) that one of your affiliates is going to send adult spam along with offers for blue widgets.

[edited by: engine at 7:20 pm (utc) on July 21, 2005]

hannamyluv




msg:541356
 9:15 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

Spitzer in NY filed suit against a company when the affiliate of their affiliate sent spam on their behalf.

[clickz.com...]

That was nearly 2 years ago. If they thought that somehow they would be treated differently, they were just stupid.

ogletree




msg:541357
 10:02 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

They have to do it that way to close loopholes.

Red_Eagle




msg:541358
 10:38 pm on Jul 21, 2005 (gmt 0)

You have to understand, while these companies prohibited affiliates from using non CAN-SPAM compliant mailing in their TOS, they were not doing anything to stop their spamming affiliates. There have been complaints for years on adult boards about these companies.

sharbel




msg:541359
 12:48 pm on Jul 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

I am willing to bet that these companies charged, one who happens to operate out of my city, have been warned several times by the government to stop. They probably figured they were safe because they were using affiliates...

I don't think it would have pursued like this without some history behind it.

submitx




msg:541360
 7:10 pm on Jul 22, 2005 (gmt 0)

Some shady companies become their own affiliates and send spam and then blame the spam on their affiliates. I would bet these guys were doing that.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Advertising / Affiliates
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved