shrirch
msg:527577 | 1:08 pm on Jul 7, 2004 (gmt 0) |
If this is the political one, I've got a fair number of red flags on the legality of what they're trying to do. The agreement is a bit clueless.
|
Webwork
msg:527578 | 1:14 pm on Jul 7, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Perhaps written by a lawyer who doesn't have a clue about what he/she is writing about. Good for a laugh, if nothing else.
|
graywolf
msg:527579 | 2:52 pm on Jul 7, 2004 (gmt 0) |
I once had an Affiliate who said you couldn't use the name of the product in the title or file name of the page.
|
sean
msg:527580 | 4:11 pm on Jul 7, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Yeah, that was good for belly laugh. Perhaps they prefer all those low-risk email marketing affiliates?
|
HughMungus
msg:527581 | 1:05 am on Jul 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
| Affiliates will NOT be paid for sales generated through search engine marketing. |
|
I'd assume they mean that you can't use an affiliate link in a PPC ad (Adsense, Overture, etc) as it dilutes their own advertising and makes them pay more for it.
|
eljefe3
msg:527582 | 4:46 am on Jul 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
What if you have a political site and just happen to get a ton of traffic to it and also get some donations from the site? Is this search engine marketing jsut because it is in the search engines. Wouldn't it be hard to tell where the traffic/donations came from on cj's end besides just having a referrer domain?
|
vibgyor79
msg:527583 | 7:34 am on Jul 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
If I was the affiliate program manager, I would have added the following to their agreement - "Affiliates would be paid once in 5 years" That should keep those pesky affiliates away.
|
hannamyluv
msg:527584 | 12:48 pm on Jul 8, 2004 (gmt 0) |
Someone has posted who it is, so just so there's not two conversations going on...
[webmasterworld.com...]
|
|
