Brett_Tabke
msg:32207 | 6:25 pm on Feb 16, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Thanks. We should do a run down again on their crawler and ip's...hint hint...
|
IanTurner
msg:32208 | 8:52 pm on Feb 16, 2002 (gmt 0) |
I will look to see what I can come up with.
|
IanTurner
msg:32209 | 10:49 pm on Feb 16, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Okay here is some data. Teoma Crawler User_agent appears to be teoma_agent1 Which I have seen from the following IP addresses over the last 4 months 63.148.5.88
63.236.92.153
63.236.92.145 Searching on Google on teoma_agent1 will give you some really nice results - lots of log files with the IP addresses. Doesn't appear to be the fastest spider in the world. I am looking at 2-3 month cycle of spidering.
|
CJ
msg:32210 | 1:16 am on Feb 17, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Bizarre, Dropped by a severe margin, still in top 10, but where has the ranks gone, checked google, fast, altavista and wisenut, the site is where it is expected to be 1-5 for the key terms targetted. Is Teoma, dependant on Direct Hit ? if it is, then i can see the problem, as the site has'nt got into DH in the last year, but gets reguarly crawled for the last four months > i stopped caring but if its going to have an effect such as this then, mmm, maybe i should start caring again.
|
IanTurner
msg:32211 | 9:11 am on Feb 17, 2002 (gmt 0) |
CJ, I think Teoma works on inbound linking same as Google, but I have found little correlation in position between the two. Possibly this is due to the small DB size.
|
|
