| 6:25 pm on Feb 16, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Thanks. We should do a run down again on their crawler and ip's...hint hint...
| 8:52 pm on Feb 16, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I will look to see what I can come up with.
| 10:49 pm on Feb 16, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Okay here is some data.
Teoma Crawler User_agent appears to be
Which I have seen from the following IP addresses over the last 4 months
Searching on Google on teoma_agent1 will give you some really nice results - lots of log files with the IP addresses.
Doesn't appear to be the fastest spider in the world. I am looking at 2-3 month cycle of spidering.
| 1:16 am on Feb 17, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Dropped by a severe margin, still in top 10, but where has the ranks gone, checked google, fast, altavista and wisenut, the site is where it is expected to be 1-5 for the key terms targetted.
Is Teoma, dependant on Direct Hit ? if it is, then i can see the problem, as the site has'nt got into DH in the last year, but gets reguarly crawled for the last four months > i stopped caring but if its going to have an effect such as this then, mmm, maybe i should start caring again.
| 9:11 am on Feb 17, 2002 (gmt 0)|
CJ, I think Teoma works on inbound linking same as Google, but I have found little correlation in position between the two. Possibly this is due to the small DB size.