| 10:10 pm on Jan 20, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Yes. At least they refreshed old sites. A search shows an updated listing on one of my sites. That was not there a couple of days ago.
| 7:26 pm on Jan 21, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I have been checking my logs and they added a lot of my pages with this update. They are actually sending me noticable traffic.
| 8:01 pm on Jan 21, 2003 (gmt 0)|
My experience went the other way - I got buried, and yes, it appears they just updated :(
| 9:01 pm on Jan 21, 2003 (gmt 0)|
how do i check if i'm in teoma?
| 9:09 pm on Jan 21, 2003 (gmt 0)|
HuhuFruFru - If you're asking what I think you're asking, it's as simple as clicking here [teoma.com] and typing in your URL.
| 9:11 pm on Jan 21, 2003 (gmt 0)|
thx SlyGuy- i just thought there might be some special command for teoma (like "allinurl:www.domain.com" for google or "url:www.domain.com" for fast)
| 3:38 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I think TEOMA just updated again. Each result now may have: "related page" and/or "more from <url>"
This features may save some step from going to the advanced search option.
so far, there are alot to like in TEOMA.
related page (something to look at...some community algo)
more page from <url> (basically site:<url> built-n)
kewl...now they need to grow relavent database and refresh. That should put them on top of google in terms of ease of use and relevancy. TOO BAD they're not so well known..I think..but words will pass if they keep with it.
by June, TEOMA should be a top hitter.
[edited by: SactoKhmer at 5:59 am (utc) on Jan. 27, 2003]
| 4:06 am on Jan 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I don't agree about growing the database as a priority. Right now Teoma has the second best results behind Google. The rest are a joke. Teoma's relevance is its strong suit, but it still could get a bit better. They shouldn't make the mistake FAST is (very slowly) recovering from. Small portions of good food is a lot better than big portions of rotten food.