homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.237.184.242
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Local / WebmasterWorld Community Center
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: lawman

WebmasterWorld Community Center Forum

    
Long urls in messages
Proposals - seeking feedback.
Brett_Tabke




msg:514851
 4:43 am on Jul 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

I need to figure out a long term solution to the long url problem.

Idea 1: Text portion of link, limited max XX chars:
[webmasterworld.com...]

Idea 2: Text portion of link, limited max XX chars, with trailers:
[webmasterworld.com...]

Idea 3: Text portion of link displayed as domain only in brackets (aka slashdot):
[webmasterworld]

On all 3 the real url would display in a title attribute mouse over.

 

Macguru




msg:514852
 5:11 am on Jul 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

I like # 2

Marcia




msg:514853
 5:27 am on Jul 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

3 looks too much like frames, 1 seems kind of incomplete.

2 is very clear that it's shortened, can't be mistaken for an error. I like 2 much better.

Lisa




msg:514854
 6:04 am on Jul 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

I like 2! Sames reason already stated.

Woz




msg:514855
 6:38 am on Jul 3, 2002 (gmt 0)

two too!

Brett_Tabke




msg:514856
 12:22 pm on Jul 11, 2002 (gmt 0)

That's probably the best. Any other ideas on it?

ggrot




msg:514857
 5:17 pm on Jul 11, 2002 (gmt 0)

I prefer 2 from the 3 options, but you might also want to consider urls with alot of trailing variable garbage such as ?pageid=q3ti8oy5voi8636, etc. That data is generally worthless to me, so ...'ing it wouldn't be a bad thing.

jatar_k




msg:514858
 5:27 pm on Jul 11, 2002 (gmt 0)

a combo of #2 and also straight cutting everything after and including "?"

bird




msg:514859
 6:00 pm on Jul 11, 2002 (gmt 0)

You'll need a pretty strong AI to figure out which of the CGI parameters contain useful information... ;)

Failing that, I think solution 2 with the proposed slash-off after any "?" would be close to optimal (leaving the "?" itself in place to show that it *is* a CGI URL).

Not sure if it's worth the effort to optimize, so that you remove only as many path elements as necessary, and only from the middle of the path string if possible.

Optimal:
http://www.example.com/some/really/.../very/long/path.html

Slightly less nice:
http://www.example.com/.../unusually/very/long/path.html
http://www.example.com/some/really/extremely/.../path.html

bird




msg:514860
 2:56 pm on Jul 12, 2002 (gmt 0)

Maybe you also want to check this thread [webmasterworld.com] for yet another idea... ;)

Knowles




msg:514861
 2:59 pm on Jul 12, 2002 (gmt 0)

I like number 2.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Local / WebmasterWorld Community Center
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved