| This 31 message thread spans 2 pages: 31 (  2 ) > > || |
|Targeting Europe - do I have to pay?|
PPC/PFI in Europe
| 8:03 pm on Jan 16, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Split off from : [webmasterworld.com...]
Thanks for the update, Heini. I am about to run a 14 sites, 13 languages by-the-book full scale test of the findings in the strategy primer and was re-reading the piece to freshen up my memory.
Although I am not too interested in paying per click or in any other fashion, I will do it if I have to. The question is: Do I have to? Or can I make it with Google and Fast and assorted other free local SE:s and directories? Competition for the targeted keywords doesn't appear to be too tough from what I have seen so far. Nothing that a WebmasterWorld member couldn't handle, anyway.
The language areas I am planning for include 120 page sites in English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Dutch, Polish, Russian, Estonian, Finnish, Swedish, Danish and Norwegian, so it is quite an ambitious project. Any thoughts?
(edited by: Brett_Tabke at 11:06 pm (utc) on Jan. 17, 2002)
| 3:29 pm on Jan 17, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Great case study for targeting Europe. I will first look at it generally, then answering it specifically for Germany. I'm sure experts from other countries will jump in to evaluate the situation in their local markets.
>paying per click or in any other fashion...Do I have to?
My immediate answer would be: no, you won't have to. But it would help.
So let's dissect the matter a bit.
What first comes to mind here is PPC.
In Europe, including the UK (yes, they DO belong to Europe, even if they haven't realized it yet ;) ) PPC is a near synonym with Espotting and Overture.
The important places displaying PPC results are some of the huge local Lycos sites, soon to come some of the local Yahoos, and Altavista. Also in Germany T-online. Yahoo works with Google results, Lycos has Fast on board. So with not too competitive terms you should be able to realize first results just working with those two free engines. AV is another case. It's expensive to get in no matter what. The question wether it's more rewarding to get there via Overture or via AV's pay for play programmes can only be answered specifically.
Next on the agenda: PFI.
Fast. Powering Lycos, with portals all over Europe accumulating a No. 1 status in sheer page impressions.
Also powering Tiscali for international searches.
Big in Scandinavia.
Fast's Partnersite programme might seriously be considered. I would suggest testing the waters by submitting perhaps one or two pages per language. It should at least jumpstart all local sites. Then it should be watched closely how the PFI programme influences Fast's regular update cycles.
Altavista: in some countries still important. Very expensive. Especially since you'd have to pay extra for each country. Would be far down in my list of priorities, decided on a per country basis.
Finally: paid directory inclusion.
This is where I would recommend to set up a budget. Paying to get into Yahoo directory, Lycos directory, important local directories is important, not so much because of the direct traffic it would bring, but because of the effect it has on Fast and most importantly Google rankings.
Finding the right directories to submit to and pay where needed is really a good way of spending some marketing Euros.
For Germany specifically I'd suggest the following:
- Pay Yahoo directory, Lycos directory, Web.de directory, Fireball directory. Think about Sharelook, look out and ask for further directories.
- try Fast PartnerSite, perhaps starting out with one page. As a side effect it's good for finetuning pages for Fast.
- You will want to get to the MSN and AOL users too. Those people don't search much, but they are many. It's expensive, not a top priority, but I would do it.
I would neither recommend Espotting nor Overture. You can make it to the top spots directly beneath PPC listings. That should be as good as a sponsored link.
Okay, Euro members, who's next?
| 4:25 pm on Jan 17, 2002 (gmt 0)|
OK, I'll jump in here. Great thread :)
You should pay the expensive but traffic rewarding Jubii. Different packages ranging from 200-1800 EURO.
Jubii is absolutely the market leader in a country where around 70% of the population visits the internet.
Pay Kvasir (SOL) for their yellow links. They're not part of the regular search results, but you can choose up to 65 keywords, which depend in the search performed. It is basically sponsored listings.
If you're really serious you should consider putting some pages in Fast as described by Heini. Fast powers websearch results at Kvasir. A few months ago you could pay Looksmart to get in the Kvasir Directory. However now it seems that the LS results don't show in the serps. Use the yellow link instead.
Pay Inktomi for a few pages to get those 3-4 keyword phrases from MSN. You could pay Looksmart local directory to get a few kompetitive keywords from the Looksmart/MSN deal. However submitting to Looksmart in Denmark is not possible right now afaik.
I wouldn't recommend paying the craizy fees Altavista charge. Av.dk is pretty much non-existent and unless you can get a top spot on a very competitive keyword I wouldn't spend another minute thinking about AV.
Get into to Google and Fast for free and you should cover some of the market. Danish searchers use Google in rapid growing numbers.
Finally submit to Yahoo.dk. You should get in pretty quickly, and it's free. They list sites really fast, give ok traffic and give you a good boost in Google.
We have lived with paying (much) for getting qualified traffic from Jubbi for years, but their anual listing fees seem pretty spicy, so if you don't do good keyword analysis before choosing your 5-30 keywords, you could be throwing Euros out the window.
<side note>Rencke, I know you have a tight grip on keywords used in Denmark, so I'll believe you will be just fine :)</sidenote>
No, not really. You can buy Sponsor Link on a CPM basis on Jubii. They're a good back up for those keyword where you just don't perform in the serps.
| 4:41 pm on Jan 17, 2002 (gmt 0)|
For the Dutch situation specifically:
I suggest getting a .be domain at least (no local presence required, you may have to be a company), and a .nl domain if you can get one (local company presence required).
Google, Altavista, Inktomi, Fast, Dmoz will get you a long way. Altavista is still important here. Yahoo directory not.
Only other major source of referrers is Ilse.nl, which returns pagina.nl (directory) results first. Try to get a directoy listing from a (sub)category which contains your keywords. (Each category is on one page only, and this page is divided in subcategories)
For the finishing touch you might consider
- kobala.nl (wise-guys.nl technology), they provide results to track.nl and freeler.nl, a major isp.
- the smaller directories, track , zoek, wwwwijzer, 1stekeuze,
No payments really required anywhere, but paying Looksmart to get on top of Msn.nl and Msn.be may be worth it depending on your site and keywords. Everytime I check another portal has dropped Looksmart though, looks like they are quickly losing ground here since they closed their offices in the netherlands.
Espotting, Overture or other ppc methods are not needed, but if you want them (ie. for altavista.com which is still popular) they will be cheap compared to english equivalents.
I've had no problems getting local domains into av and ink for free, but is unpredictable how long it will take if you ever make it in without paying. That's no different then elswhere for these two engines I guess.
| 7:08 pm on Jan 17, 2002 (gmt 0)|
How about some links to the other primers (If they exists ;) )
| 10:13 am on Jan 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Part 1 [webmasterworld.com]
Part 1 [webmasterworld.com]
Part 1 [webmasterworld.com]
Part 2 [webmasterworld.com]
European Overview [webmasterworld.com]
| 11:25 am on Jan 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Will Yahoo and Looksmart review sites in languages other than English ?
| 12:14 pm on Jan 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Conor, of course they will. We are not talking Yahoo.com here. We are talking about local engines and portals.
So, do we have to pay to target the UK? - France? - Italy?
| 4:34 pm on Jan 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
heini wrote "In Europe, including the UK (yes, they DO belong to Europe, even if they haven't realized it yet )"
bit OT Bait for me! ...
Oh yes heini we have ... except that the word "belong" is a bit strong for us!!
UK / Britain is a European nation, it is true that many here do not recognise this and frequently talk about going to Europe when they cross the channel.
Many Germans however talk about the great time they had when they were in England visiting Glasgow or Cardiff.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
| 4:43 pm on Jan 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Heini wrote "So, do we have to pay to target the UK?"
Ideally a domain.co.uk
Listing at yahoo.co.uk .. someone tell me is this different from a .com listing?
dmoz works I think without national boundaries.
My impression is that a .co.uk domain will put your pages into the UK only search results from the multinational search engines anyhow as would a .de or .fr
Additionally there will be lots of small UK directories you might want to get an entry into depending on what your website is about.
| 5:03 pm on Jan 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
>UK / Britain is a European nation
From the perspective of doing a Europe wide SEO campaign the UK undoubtly is a European nation. In fact it's one of the top three or four markets to target. Internet usage figures and online shopping habits indicate the UK being the most advanced market of the huge European countries.
There is however one important factor that makes targeting the UK somewhat special: the language. British members have stated repeatedly how much harder their work is with the heavy competition from the US.
So, can you make it to the top in the UK without doing PPC/PFI?
| 5:26 pm on Jan 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
In Italy we are waiting for the partnership Yahoo.it/eSpotting, starting next May, just to see if it works really.
We don't have at this time local search engines publishing Overture's ppc listings, and local ppc search engines like godado.it or intruso.it don't generate traffic enough.
Pay Inktomi only if you have a .it domain.
Maybe Fast Partnersite will be a good choice: fast powers arianna.it "search in the world" option, excite.it, lycos.it, inwind.
Altavista in Italy? You have to pay... or to pray:-)
Google is the best traffic driver in Italy, too; it powers yahoo's and Virgilio's web search.
| 6:31 pm on Jan 18, 2002 (gmt 0)|
> British members have stated repeatedly how much harder their work is with the heavy competition from the US.
That is a very good point and if you have customers who are targetting their web marketing within the UK specifically then you will have that challenge. I suspect that would be mainly B2C.
I have not had relevant experience, my target customers (B2B) are tending to target the "english speaking" area with their english language websites.
I will be interested in answers from people who are doing work on B2C websites which do target the UK. It annoys me that UK do not normally use domain.uk as in teh case of domain.de or domain.fr but as you know Heini we like to be different :-)
| 8:44 am on Jan 19, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I've been trying to find some statistics about search engine usage in Finland, but couldn't find any. Perhaps you get some kind of overview if I give you the figures of my own finnish site.
Google 62%, Altavista 19%, MSN 8%, Sonera Plaza 5%, Yahoo 3%, Lycos, Alltheweb, Northern Light and Excite about 0,5% each.
Note that a .fi domain is required for Suomi24 (finnish Evreka) and I have a .net, so I don't get any traffic from them. I've got an impression that they are can give pretty good traffic. Local precence is required to get a .fi.
As you see AV is still big here, but declining (perhaps not as fast as elsewhere). I still wouldn't pay for inclusion.
Now that IE is hijacking lots of traffic to MSN, it might be a good idea to get an inktomi page or two, otherwise I wouldn't bother to pay.
Hope this helps.
| 3:37 pm on Jan 19, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Lots of useful new info here.
Mark_A: You say that domain.co.uk is ideal. I hadn't thought of that and intended to serve the UK with the multi-purpose English site, which is a dot-com. Needless to say, making a copy with prices in pounds, rather than both $ and £ is easy enough. Do you feel it is necessary though? (This is a B2C project btw)
Marlog: On the assumption that .it requires local presence, I bought a dot-com with the prime keyword in Italian to serve Italy. Is that an OK approach you think? Used the same approach for all other language areas where local presence is necessary and secured the prime keyword in domain.at (for the German speaking countries) and domain.be (for the French speaking areas) only. Plus hyphenated keyword1-keyword2.dk for Denmark.
| 4:15 pm on Jan 19, 2002 (gmt 0)|
rencke wrote "I hadn't thought of that and intended to serve the UK with the multi-purpose English site, which is a dot-com."
Rencke I do not prentend to be expert in these things not being a pro SEO etc but I think it more than likely that the larger search engines and directories may take account of a .co.uk and assign it to their UK results whereas a .com is unclear, it could be US it could be commercial or in fact it could be anyhere.
"Needless to say, making a copy with prices in pounds, rather than both $ and £ is easy enough. Do you feel it is necessary though? (This is a B2C project btw)"
Quite possibly, approvals etc are quite different between US and UK depending again on what you are selling.
Consumer concerns in the USA and UK may also differ. VAT (sales tax) is flat rate 17.5% across UK .. US differs state to state .. How would you handle delivery if appropriate US - UK will be quite a bit different?
It would I imagine depend a great deal on what the site is selling (electrical products for example 110VAC US 240VAC UK).
If you are going to have interaction / discussion etc Brits might like (for once) to be seperate from Americans with whom we only share part of our language :-)
Just some thoughts, I am not a B2C expert by any maner of speaking. Hope it helps though.
| 5:43 pm on Jan 19, 2002 (gmt 0)|
> Next on the agenda: PFI.
uh... what's PFI?
For France, paying isn't really necessary... yet! For now, paying will get you into several directories/SE *faster* but you can still get in just about everywhere free, and do just as well.
As for PPC, overture produces very few results for French keywords. Anyone know of any up-and-coming services? Is espotting producing any *real* results in .fr SE's yet?
| 8:23 pm on Jan 19, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I run a couple of B2C sites in the UK, .co.uk is definitely an advantage for getting a local audience, however .com is the greater traffic generator. Most SEs are at about 70/30.
Many UK users prefer to purchase in £ - (Ian - still pissed off about not being in Euro)
Mark didn't really mention Ask.co.uk which is a good traffic generator but is insanely difficult - submit via email to email@example.com but paid listings will probably generate better results.
Lycos.co.uk is the only place you really need the .co.uk domain to get good performance.
Looksmart.co.uk is probably worth the fee - I have just paid for inclusions so will no more soon.
DMOZ listing under UK regional category is really good for promoting a .com to UK audience.
| 2:46 pm on Jan 20, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Zeb: Suomi24 uses Fast's main index, so there is no .fi requirement. BUT: The default search is set to "Suomesta" i.e. Finnish sites and the default language option is set to "Kaikki kielet" i.e. any language. If people just enter the keyword and nothing else, they will see only .fi sites, usually in Finnish. If you try setting the site option to "maailmalta" i.e. the whole web and the language option to "suomi", i.e. Finnish, you will get very different results with lots of dot-nets and dot-coms.
Your 62% traffic factor for Google is hugely interesting though. Even if it is only for one single site, it certainly shows massive Google presence in the Finnish market. As to a Finland overview, you will find it here: [webmasterworld.com...]
Louponne: PFI means Pay for Inclusion, i.e. the case where you have to pay to be spidered, like Inktomi. Glad to hear I won't have to pay in France, as I have great hopes for my French site in topkeyword.be
Mark_A: Thanks for the input, the site is selling discounted hotel accomodations in Stockholm, so there is no VAT problem. I will seriously consider a .co.uk after what you and Ian have pointed out.
IanTurner: DMOZ regional listings is one very big reason why the 13 language versions are stuck into different domains.
| 10:49 pm on Jan 20, 2002 (gmt 0)|
You are quite right about suomi24 not requiring a .fi-domain. However, if someone searches for a page in finnish, he/she definately uses the defaults and gets only results with .fi. This means that I (or you) won't get any traffic from them. My site has more than 100 pages in both Fast and Google, but has got just a handfull of visitors from SE's using Fast and at the same time more than 1000 visitors from Google. What a pity!
The coclusion. Brett's comment somewhere about a post Google web is very, very scary!
| 12:00 am on Jan 21, 2002 (gmt 0)|
>Is espotting producing any *real* results in .fr SE's yet?
Espotting is on Lycos.fr and on Altavista.fr. Not sure how much AV is worth these days in France, but Lycos should bring some traffic.
Checking Espotting.fr anyhow I saw that only primary keywords are bidded on, most combos are still free.
So a good Fast ranking should do for Lycos. It might be an option though to try and get into Lycos directory. Not sure if that is still free and if so, for how long?
| 4:08 pm on Jan 21, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Good to see ya´ around. Now, maby I can start posting again.
| 4:24 pm on Jan 21, 2002 (gmt 0)|
> Espotting is on Lycos.fr and on Altavista.fr. Not sure how much AV is worth these days
> in France, but Lycos should bring some traffic.
Right - Lycos has done some pretty heavy advertizing in FR - television, radio, newspapers/magazines, etc.
> Checking Espotting.fr anyhow I saw that only primary keywords are bidded on, most combos are still free.
wow, free! I'm heading straight over! ;-)
> So a good Fast ranking should do for Lycos. It might be an option though to try and get into Lycos directory. Not sure if that is still free and if so, for how long?
Yes, still free - for how long? Who knows. Lycos directory listing definitely worth it. As are listings in voila.fr and nomade.fr directories in addition to the obvious yahoo.fr
(edited by: louponne at 5:28 pm (utc) on Jan. 21, 2002)
| 5:22 pm on Jan 21, 2002 (gmt 0)|
>Marlog: On the assumption that .it requires >local presence, I bought a dot-com with the >prime keyword in Italian to serve Italy. Is that >an OK approach you think?
Yes, the approach is the right one. The only search engine that penalizes italian web sites without .it domains is MSN Italy (search.msn.it, using Inktomi). The others accept italian websites with .com domains without problems.
| 2:12 am on Jan 22, 2002 (gmt 0)|
>The important places displaying PPC results are some of the huge local Lycos sites, soon to come some of the local Yahoos, and Altavista.
Do does anyone know if this includes Australia as well?
| 7:12 am on Jan 22, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I'm not sure on this, but I would recommend asking the experts over in the Asia and Pacific [webmasterworld.com] forum.
| 12:17 am on Jan 23, 2002 (gmt 0)|
I wonder what the situation in central eastern Europe is? I can't imagine any PPC schemes in ation here. The only possible way to spend money on targeting local search engines in those countries would be paid inclusion or paid review for directories.
In Russia [webmasterworld.com] we have a dominant player with Yandex, followed by Rambler - any chance money would help to get in there?
| 4:30 pm on Jan 26, 2002 (gmt 0)|
Coming back to France I found that actually all three top directories offer paid inclusion, Voila.fr, Yahoo.fr and Nomade.fr. For details see French thread [webmasterworld.com].
With all Lycos top portals going paid [webmasterworld.com], it sure is just a matter of time when all important directory listing in France must be purchased.
| 9:13 pm on Jan 26, 2002 (gmt 0)|
> France I found that actually all three top directories offer paid inclusion
um, yes, I said that above - they offer paid solutions for *faster* inclusion. But all still offer free submission too, and it's not all that much of a wait.
| 9:27 pm on Jan 26, 2002 (gmt 0)|
>um, yes, I said that above
Right Louponne, one of the reasons I checked it out was that remark of yours ;)
>free submission too, and it's not all that much of a wait.
That's good to hear. Do you think this is true also for commercial sites in competitive cats?
| This 31 message thread spans 2 pages: 31 (  2 ) > > |