homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.161.192.130
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Search Engines / Directories
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: Webwork & skibum

Directories Forum

This 64 message thread spans 3 pages: < < 64 ( 1 2 [3]     
Quality of Process; DMOZ Editor Selection
Is there a hidden editor selection agenda?
davidhart

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2349 posted 10:16 pm on Feb 15, 2005 (gmt 0)

I withdrew my Editor application today, the result of several distrubing incidents and what appears to be an unacceptable lack of accountability for process.

The final straw was the post by someone today, in the ODP forum, who had just been approved as an editor. According to the post, she works for a web design firm with 300 clients "not to mention my companies <sic> websites" and her job is "SEO."

Numerous people have been waiting months for application status. The last time I checked (I applied on January 7), I was informed "when we get around to it, we'll get around to it." Nice.

Doing some checking on the aforementioned new editor, I find that she was approved in about two weeks. Moreover, when she checked the status of her application in the forum, she did so prior to the mandated two weeks, could not recall the exact date of her application and gave the wrong user name twice. All apparent sins in the DMOZ culture. When the mess was sorted out she followed up with "I will check back in a few weeks if I have had no responce <sic>."

Given the poor grammar and spelling of her communications; combined with poor attention to detail and a failure to folloow procedure, does it strike anyone else as odd that a person whose job is SEO was processed and approved so quickly?

What is that all about? One also wonders if her employer (who derives a direct economic benefit) had anything to do with greasing the skids.

 

The Contractor

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2349 posted 12:46 pm on Mar 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

My impression might be wrong.

Yes, your impression is wrong. It takes nothing more than a sincere wish to help out, decent grammar, choosing the correct category in both size and knowledge, candidness of affiliations, and submitting a few decent sites (that are not already listed) in your application with guideline compliant titles and descriptions.

Believe what you want, but the above is all there is to it. There are no secrets to becoming an editor or getting a site accepted.

helleborine

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2349 posted 1:58 pm on Mar 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

It's not what I "want" to believe, it's what I'm hearing from kctiption.

kctipton

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2349 posted 2:57 pm on Mar 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Oh good grief.

There is no "too big," and "too small" would have more to do with someone who makes big claims who has almost nothing about them to be found on the public web.

helleborine

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2349 posted 3:04 pm on Mar 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

Thank you for the clarification. Your meaning was not obvious to me from your initial statement.

This 64 message thread spans 3 pages: < < 64 ( 1 2 [3]
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Search Engines / Directories
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved