|Am I right or do i miss something? |
Yes, you miss that DMOZ editors are placing sites, not you, and that none of the factors you mentioned are taken into consideration when a site is reviewed by them.
Unless by coincidence the category you choose based on that strategy is also the appropriate one according to DMOZ guidelines, the best you can get out of your approach is a delay of a review in the right place. I won't go into details of the worst case scenario.
thank you for your answer:
I maybe was not explicit enough.
I have 2 categories to choose from that both reflect my content best. I want to apply these rules too choose from these 2 categories.
None of them is a useful way of deciding.
Your submission may be a catalyst for the editor to split the category and move the sites who-knows-where.
Or to whizz through the submission queue and add another 100 sites, making the category very crowded.
Or to whizz through the category and delete the dead wood, so few sites remain.
Submit to the most appropriate category, and you have the bst chance of being added relatively quicky.
Submit to a less appropriate category, and you risk doubling the review time (the first editor simply punts it over to the other category).
So, focus on the best catgory from the ODP's perspective.
The most important factor for you would almost always be to put the site in the category ODP editors are least likely to move it from. If an editor forwards your submission to another category, it can significantly extend the amount of time your suggested URL awaits review. So "shooting" for a higher-PR or less-populated category is probably really just shooting yourself in the foot.
If the reason you think your site is perfectly suited to two different categories is because one is a Regional widgetry category for the exact town your factory is based in and the other is a Business category for the exact kind of widgetry you produce, though, I have good news for you: you may submit to both. That is actually the ONLY situation (except for multilingual sites) in which the ODP welcomes two submissions of the same site, and frequently awards two listings. (-:
Choosing the best category is one thing but you need patience when you submit. I submitted a site 9 months ago and was told in May that it was still awaiting review. Now, when I do a search for our website name one of the top results is the DMOZ forum inquiry I placed in May regarding the submission delay. I'm not convinced it is even worth it to monitor the submission status or even consider the DMOZ submission and eventual(?) appearance as a valuable entity.
Monitoring submission status after you have confirmation that the site suggestion has been recieved, is a little pointless.
If the site's appearance in DMOZ is worthless, then you can be fairly sure that the reviewing editor would have come to that conclusion too, and not added the site.
Some stats -- DMOZ reached 4,000,000 sites at the beginning of December 2004. It is now 4,490,295. That's a net growth of around 2000 sites a day.
Which means (what with deletions, declined submisions, submissions being re-sorted after inaccurately targeted submission; plus all the non-submission-queue research editors do) there's probably 2,500 new sites added every day, plus an indeterminate number being given an initial or partial review.
Being one of the 2500 for a day is not that hard -- much easier than being in the Google top 10 for many search terms: Be in the right category
Have a real site (not solely affliate pages, not "under construction", etc)
Of course, it helps if the right category is not one that is spammed to death. If you've chosen a business model such that a spammy cat is the right one for you, then that's a risk that should be up-front on the business plan.
Victor summed it up very well! Thanks!
Victor said: "Monitoring submission status after you have confirmation that the site suggestion has been recieved, is a little pointless."
BaseVinyl says: "Not really pointless. It's like ordering a product and asking for a UPS shipping number to track the progress of the order. You may have confirmation that your order was recieved and payment was processed but wouldn't you like to see the progress of the shipment? It's easy to say "yes it was shipped and we have your money" but show a customer a tangible link to the transaction and they will remain confident. If you call and request the shipment status on an order and someone says "Your package is awaiting approval in the queue...time delay unknown" then you may just have to hope that the product you ordered is not time-sensitive. Delays and generic responses will make a customer wonder if it is a viable organization"
[edited by: BaseVinyl at 1:06 am (utc) on Aug. 1, 2004]
>I have 2 categories to choose from that both reflect my content best. I want to apply these rules too choose from these 2 categories.
Are you sure DMOZ editors would agree that there are 2 categories that are equally suitable for your site to be listed in? Look at the sites that are already listed in those 2 cats. Then compare your site to that, and consider which are most similar to your site.
The problem for me is that the perfect category has no editor. Another close but overcrowded and not as perfect category has an editor.
Which one is better to submit to?
>The problem for me is that the perfect category has no editor. Another close but overcrowded and not as perfect category has an editor.
No such thing as a cat with no editor at the ODP. Meta editors and editalls can edit *wherever* they please in the directory. And if the cat has no listed editor, any editor higher up the tree can edit there. Also, just because a cat has a listed editor doesn't mean that editor is very active. Or very active in that cat, which is possible if they are a listed editor in a number of different cats. At the ODP an editor will remain listed for 4 months after their last edit. It's quite possible that listed editor in that the close but overcrowded cat *died* 3 1/2 months ago. If so, that editor obviously wouldn't be able to resign. ;)
Thus, your assumption that your site would be reviewed faster if you submitted to that close but overcrowded cat may be wrong.
Yeah, definitely submit to the better category with no named editor. Otherwise the editor of the worse category would probably forward it to the better one. This would mean you'd have to wait for review twice. Even one wait is too long for many webmasters' tastes; don't set yourself up for two. (-:
It's a big misconception among the general population that a category with a named editor automatically gets more attention than a category without. Sites in all subcategories of an editor's category get called to his or her attention equally. So a category with no named editor, but with a highly active editor one level up, could get much more attention than a category with a named editor who logs in infrequently. It's probably a bad idea to try to second-guess things like that.
Appeals to moral virtues may not persuade here. Let's get down to brass tacks where the rubber meets the road:
When you submit to the wrong category because it has a named editor, you don't know whether the editor is active now. You don't know whether the editor has been active in the last six months. You don't know whether the editor has EVER edited ANYTHING in that category. All you know is that when last the page was modifed, the editor had edited something, SOMEWHERE, sometime in the previous four months.
That, IMO, is not a very useful bit of trivia.
On the other hand, when you submit to a category that is not the absolute best one, what happens is ... you wait for some editor to review the site. Upon reviewing, the editor will move it to something CLOSER to the absolute best category ... where it will wait in that heap for an editor to pick it for review (and possibly move it still closer for another wait.) [Although it is possible to do so, editors generally will NOT list a site outside the category they're working in. For many good and sufficient reasons, they'll wait until they're working in the other category.]
So after multiple waits for review and possible multiple missed opportunities for review FOR LISTING, the submittal ends up in the place where you didn't want to submit it because it might wait too long.
This, IMO, is not the optimum approach.
Another factoid you might want to bear in mind: in "competitive" categories, over 99% of the edits are made by editors who are NOT listed as editor of that category.
So you can chase a fractional 1% of the fish with outdated and flawed angling guides, or you can ... help the nice ODP editors find the best category for your site.
ok, thanks to you all for your reply. I understand now what to do:
1- find the best category by description and other sites listed: 1 on theme and 1 on regional and
2- submit to those 2 regardless of it having a editor or not.
Actually, the reality is more that site suggesters are our potential suppliers, not our customers so your analogy above is incorrect.
|BaseVinyl said: Not really pointless. It's like ordering a product and asking for a UPS shipping number to track the progress of the order. You may have confirmation that your order was recieved and payment was processed but wouldn't you like to see the progress of the shipment? It's easy to say "yes it was shipped and we have your money" but show a customer a tangible link to the transaction and they will remain confident. If you call and request the shipment status on an order and someone says "Your package is awaiting approval in the queue...time delay unknown" then you may just have to hope that the product you ordered is not time-sensitive. Delays and generic responses will make a customer wonder if it is a viable organization |
|t's like ordering a product and asking for a UPS shipping number to track the progress of the order. |
It's more like sending a press release. It will turn into a news article -- if it has anything news-worthy in it.
But it is unlikely to get turned into a Page 1 banner headline news article just because your marketing strategy depends on that.
You can use the OPD public forums to ask the equivalent of "did you get my press release?" but you can't expect the equivalent of busy journalists (for whom press releases are just one source of information) to instigate a press-release tracking system that reports back to you.
And sending press releases to the wrong department at a newspaper is a good way to get them lost. The arts editor isn't going to publish your breakthrough in low car rental prices just because the Arts dept is less busy than the comercial editor.