| 3:54 pm on Apr 17, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Recently on the ODP Weblog it was said,
"Robozilla, our automated link checker, has just completed a run of the directory and has flagged up any addresses which are not working. Due to the growth of the directory in recent months and the long gap between this and the previous run, more errors were found than usual."
This was on 4-14, so maybe you caught them just after the culling?
| 4:13 pm on Apr 17, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Someone just recently mentioned in a Google thread a new automated process to detect expireds.
I'll sticky the member.
| 5:50 pm on Apr 17, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Does any meta have further details? I recall a case where the software automatically flagged an expired domain. My understanding of ODP policy is that maintaining what sites that are already listed is a top priority, and I'd certainly check out quickly any possible hijacked domains. My guess is the poster here is referring to a case where there have been major improvements at the ODP in culling scammers.
| 6:31 pm on Apr 17, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Robozilla finds only entries that are nonworking. We have some methods to find sites right when a domain becomes available, but all that is very much in beta stage and - as you will surely understand - we won't give out any details.
If you want to report the changed links, head over to the official ODP forum and use the apropriate thread or use the "Update URL" feature to request removal for every link. be sure to include a reason we can validate.
| 7:22 pm on Apr 17, 2004 (gmt 0)|
idoc, PLEASE provide that list to us. Things like that make the whole directory look bad, and we like to fix them quickly.
| 7:37 pm on Apr 17, 2004 (gmt 0)|
|When I checked at the odp though, I can't find them in searching by domain. Is there a better way to check this... |
The search index is about a month old. Once it's updated it'll be easier for you to be sure that something is or is not in the directory.