| 11:37 pm on Mar 22, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I've noticed this too for one of the sites I work on, the vast majority of the traffic comes from msn after getting a good zeal listing. These results are for really competitive keywords too, in my case the zeal listing is way more beneficial in traffic terms than my two dmoz listings.
| 11:38 pm on Mar 22, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Hi PF Online
How much do they charge? Glad for you if it works... how long have you been on it?
I would love to hear of any other experiences of people that have tried it
| 11:44 pm on Mar 22, 2003 (gmt 0)|
SEO_Practicioner: Free for non-commercial sites!
| 11:47 pm on Mar 22, 2003 (gmt 0)|
<rfgdxm1 raises hand>
I get way more traffic from Google/Yahoo/AOL because I am #1 and #3 on the SERPs for the 2 most important keywords people searching for my site will use. However, msn.com is a very strong 480 hits for my site this month. The truth is besides Google/Yahoo/AOL and msn.com, all the rest of the search engines aren't that relevant. Hmm...2 whole hits this month from Wisenut. ;) I'm #1 on msn.com for those 2 critical keywords, and also a few lesser ones, because of my Zeal listing.
| 11:49 pm on Mar 22, 2003 (gmt 0)|
>How much do they charge?
Free, but it has to be non-commercial content. However, a non-commercial page about the safe use of widgets on a site that sells widgets is OK.
| 10:56 am on Mar 24, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I get more referers from Google and Yahoo, but I do pretty nicely on MSN too. Partly it's because I've got that Zeal listing - it's really helped me on MSN!
| 11:37 am on Mar 24, 2003 (gmt 0)|
my clients all get most of their traffic from google, aol and yahoo! They are mostly business sites though, so i dont know if that makes any difference?
| 4:06 pm on Mar 24, 2003 (gmt 0)|
One of my sites gets more hits from MSN search than Google. Unfortunately, I can see from the search terms what an inferior search engine it is. The hits from Google are almost always on target, but from MSN I often feel embarrassed the searchers get sent my way.