Napoleon
msg:478945 | 5:00 pm on Sep 19, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Pity.... it was a good day until this point. Still - I suppose you could argue that L$ and MSN deserve each other. Hopefully they will sink together.
|
jatar_k
msg:478946 | 5:05 pm on Sep 19, 2002 (gmt 0) |
anyone have any idea where the L$ small business listings show up? MSN is so murky. They should just make deals with google and yahoo too. Why leave anyone out. I get a lot of traffic from them but, WOW, they have garbage results. All of the non tech people I know despise their search, they are always asking me what site they should use.
|
JamesR
msg:478947 | 11:10 pm on Sep 19, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Sounds like they are doing everything they can to survive. I wonder what kind of revenue MSN and Alta are getting from it? Stock creeps over $1, wow, 52 week low of .31 about a year ago. Surprised they weren't delisted from the NASDAQ....maybe that is on par for that index :)
|
mr_dredd2
msg:478948 | 8:21 am on Sep 20, 2002 (gmt 0) |
yeah, i'll be interested to see where else looksmart listings are going to appear. so, does this mean that inktomi are carrying on with msn?
|
Tor
msg:478949 | 8:34 am on Sep 20, 2002 (gmt 0) |
so, does this mean that inktomi are carrying on with msn?
|
|
No, that is a totally separate deal that is been negotiated with several different suppliers. A conclusion should be reached quite soon.
|
rfgdxm1
msg:478950 | 10:17 am on Sep 20, 2002 (gmt 0) |
>Stock creeps over $1, wow, 52 week low of .31 about a year ago. Surprised they weren't delisted from the NASDAQ....maybe that is on par for that index Looksmart has a market capitalizaton of over 100 million shares, which means they are worth a tenth of a billion bucks. That ain't chicken feed.
|
kris
msg:478951 | 9:00 pm on Sep 20, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Neither is $100 million ;)
|
lgn
msg:478952 | 3:27 am on Sep 21, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Looksmart worth $100 million. Who's doing the
accounting? Arthur-Anderson.
|
chadandrew
msg:478953 | 5:36 am on Sep 21, 2002 (gmt 0) |
LookSmart would be a good stock to short, if they're valued that high. That's a joke! [edited by: Laisha at 12:14 pm (utc) on Sep. 21, 2002]
[edit reason] Changed derogatory term to "LookSmart" [/edit]
|
|
