| 11:54 pm on Dec 3, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Neat :) Havent seen that name in a while.
| 11:55 pm on Dec 3, 2004 (gmt 0)|
I have a soft spot for both of these companies - and there is some awesome synergy available here combining desktop search and web search.
I love to fire up Copernic for keyword research and competition assessment - gives me a whole different view of things.
| 8:07 am on Dec 11, 2004 (gmt 0)|
|I love to fire up Copernic for keyword research and competition assessment - gives me a whole different view of things. |
tedster - Would you expand on this a bit. I've got to confess that I've never used Copernic, figuring it wasn't relevant to SEO for the major engines.
| 3:44 pm on Dec 16, 2004 (gmt 0)|
damn, two quebec products, that didn't quite live up to the expectations.
but now that I think about it, and if Copernic hasn't changed, it could be a good tool for me, as it uses all the major search engines for its results, and even stores these search results I think. Could be a good way to track how pages move in multiple serps with time. Interesting....
anyways, might mamma.com be returning? I think its gonna take them a lot of work to do so
| 6:35 pm on Dec 16, 2004 (gmt 0)|
I thought no one had expectations for Mamma. It is a clean metasearch with relevant default results provided by Teoma. I have to admit some confusion as to how Copernic helps Mamma metasearch.