PFOnline
msg:414660 | 10:09 pm on Apr 20, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Ooh, just found some others to try: "Suggest a link" + "your keyword(s)"
"Suggest a site" + "your keywords(s)"
"Suggest URL" + "your keyword(s)"
"Suggest an URL" + "your keyword(s)" P.S. I suggest drinking a mountain dew, (or something with alot of caffeine) and then doing it. ;)
|
tedster
msg:414661 | 10:15 pm on Apr 20, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Since you're using quoted phrases in your search, also use "add a URL" and not just "add an URL". Much of the world pronounces it U-R-L and not "earl".
|
mil2k
msg:414662 | 11:13 am on Apr 22, 2003 (gmt 0) |
How about "Your Region" + "Add url"
and other various combinations with your region.
|
chrisnrae
msg:414663 | 1:39 am on Apr 29, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Excellent suggestions. I have done some of these, but never thought to use suggest or your region. :)
|
lorax
msg:414664 | 2:13 am on Apr 29, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Slick idea. Any idea what the conversion rate is on this sort of idea. For instance, how many of the requests you make actually turn into a working link?
|
pageoneresults
msg:414665 | 2:24 am on Apr 29, 2003 (gmt 0) |
This is a great information thread. How about this? "your keywords" + "directory"
"your keywords" + "directories"
|
coosblues
msg:414666 | 3:09 am on Apr 29, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Thanks to you all for your suggestions. I've used a couple of them and had great success. Good luck to you all
|
paynt
msg:414667 | 4:13 am on Apr 29, 2003 (gmt 0) |
keyword reciprocal
keyword exchange
keyword add site
keyword resources
keyword links To name a few more I've used.
|
jeremymgp
msg:414668 | 1:46 pm on Apr 29, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Hi, I'm getting an excellent conversion rate from this idea, perhaps because link forms are themselves a kind of information request and are therefore more likely to be responded to. Only trouble is there's a lot of PR 0-3 pages coming up with these searches - any way to weed them out? Then it really would be great, all the best, Jeremy
|
Nick_W
msg:414669 | 1:52 pm on Apr 29, 2003 (gmt 0) |
guestbook + "your keywords" Let's not do the GB thing but if they're on topic and not being discounted it's worth checking out... Nick
|
webwoman
msg:414670 | 5:00 pm on Apr 29, 2003 (gmt 0) |
"gossamer" + "keyword"
|
creative craig
msg:414671 | 5:03 pm on Apr 29, 2003 (gmt 0) |
I been busy all afternoon with all of these, should have a few .edu links thanks to the "Suggest an URL" + "your keyword(s)" idea :) Craig
|
willybfriendly
msg:414672 | 7:22 pm on Apr 29, 2003 (gmt 0) |
"keyword resources" I thought this would be a great one. Indeed, I discovered another #1 listing for one of my sites :) Guess I've been doing something right! WBF
|
Skylo
msg:414673 | 11:54 am on May 2, 2003 (gmt 0) |
All my links on my link pages have been from results i have found from typing in "submit a site" + "keyword". Seems to always do the trick
|
Craig_F
msg:414674 | 11:57 am on May 2, 2003 (gmt 0) |
don't forget "your industry" +add url, directories, etc...
|
paynt
msg:414675 | 1:31 pm on May 2, 2003 (gmt 0) |
You can also look for peripheral market/audiences to your own. If someone were to look in directory for your product/service, what else might they be looking for. Open new linking opportunities. So, you would use all the suggestions above for these peripheral keywords.
|
linkshark
msg:414676 | 1:36 pm on May 2, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Here's my favorite from a few years back: allinurl:wwwboard keyword(s) <related>
[webmasterworld.com...]
</related> I still don't know what a themed canonical vortal is..... Paynt? ;-)
|
paynt
msg:414677 | 3:36 pm on May 2, 2003 (gmt 0) |
linkshark see [webmasterworld.com...] for a new discussion.
|
SEO practioner
msg:414678 | 3:56 pm on May 2, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Reciprocal Link Exchange Program Proposal
|
topr8
msg:414679 | 8:18 pm on May 2, 2003 (gmt 0) |
great list! all of the above pretty much covers those actively seeking to exchange links. so how about looking for links pages that don't solicit links but who just might add you if you ask nicely! favourite links
cool sites
cool places
recommended links etc etc [ all + keyword of course]
depending on your keyword area this can work well
|
paynt
msg:414680 | 8:22 pm on May 2, 2003 (gmt 0) |
submit
submit article
submit content
article submission
content submission
|
PFOnline
msg:414681 | 8:55 pm on May 2, 2003 (gmt 0) |
webwoman had a very interesting idea... It turns out, "gossamer" comes from gossamer threads, which is a script that sites use for maintaining and adding there links. The only reason I would shy from Gossamer though, is if your doing this to hopefully help your Google backlinks jump... Gossamer threads, from what I've seen make your sites link into site.com/cgi-bin/JUMP-ID=2345 (not a direct URL) But if your doing it just to maybe get a few hits to your traffic, than Gossamer is good. I wonder if there are any other link scripts that might be good to try, plus your keywords...? P.S. (guestbook + keywords) and (free for all links + your keywords) is bad!
|
paynt
msg:414682 | 9:25 pm on May 2, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Don't forget to visit the sites in the directories you find as potential partners. After all, these folks are obviously linking. May give you ideas for new markets or audience.
|
Oaf357
msg:414683 | 1:11 am on May 5, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Okay. I've been using some of the methods in here tonight and have quite a few ideas/questions. Right now I'm using HotBot (going between Google, FAST, Inktomi, and Teoma) and am trying these "ideas" with all four search engines. The question is how well does this work? I'm not checking PR (as I have no means) of the pages I'm submitting links to. Any concerns there?
|
xcandyman
msg:414684 | 10:19 am on May 9, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Don't forget "related sites" + your keyword
"related urls" + your keyword Steve
|
|
