|Conflicting Link Advice|
To link or not to be, that is the quandary
| 11:56 pm on Mar 11, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Everyone seems to agree, it is good to get links (to your site). And to avoid links from bad neighborhoods (adult sites and Stanford U).
But then it becomes muddy, to say the least. I am talking about link exchanging and with both on and off topic sites. I have seen sites get amazing PR from link exchanging, both with on and off subject sites.
So here are my questions.
I have a "blue widgets product sales" site. Should I;
1) Reciprocal link at all?
2) Reciprocal link with off subject sites, like my friends "cold thingy services" site?
3) Reciprocal link with related sites, like "green widget information" sites?
4) Reciprocal link with other "blue widgets product sales" sites?
I ask, as I have seen reciprocal linking benefit many sites. Google seem to advise against anything whose sole purpose is to manipulate search returns, yet do not seem to object to link exchanges (or am I wrong). And then I read in another thread about some guy who has three "blue widget product sales" sites and is advised NOT to cross link them as this is a "no-no".
Can others help qualify?
| 3:06 pm on Mar 12, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Hi, i agree there is a lot of conflicting information about linking, but i find the following post about linking very interesting, and informative... although it seems more about the purpose/ethics surrounding linking.
And as with everything i read through bretts post on building a successful site... trying to find something applicable to the question in front of me. So try reading that there soem useful point in there.
| 12:39 am on Mar 13, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Thanks, I had a loom around that thread but it was a year ago and not really pertaining to link exchanges, just linking in general. Do you / does anyone have any current views / experience on this?
| 1:55 am on Mar 13, 2003 (gmt 0)|
My thoughts are that you should allow anyone who wants to link to you to do so (excluding farms, adult, etc.). Sites in your industry will be more powerful links (from the search engine perspective), but some off topic sites may prove to be steady traffic providers.
The trickiest thing will be how you choose to reciprocate the links. You will also notice that once you get a good base of links (even on the off topic sites) that other sites will contact you because they found you through someone linking to you.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I have never heard of penalties for linking to off topic sites. You just need to make them seem somewhat relevant to your users.
| 11:14 pm on Mar 16, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I had the same quandary when I first joined WW, and I asked about it, and was advised to exercise extreme caution and not to trade links with the people I wanted to link with because they might be "spammy".
I ignored this advice and traded links with an extensive neighborhood of sites in my industry. Subsequently, I have done very well in the SERPS, and I have yet to see anyone in my neighborhood draw a penalty, dispite some of them using various shady tactics.
My opinion, for what it's worth, is that the whole paranoia trip about linking is overblown. Look at the sites you link to. Don't link to obvious link farms or total junk (why would you want to anyway?). Other than that, I say go ahead and trade links like crazy. It seems to have worked well for me, and it also seems to be working well for others in my neighborhood.