homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.204.59.230
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: martinibuster

Link Development Forum

    
Reciprocal Linking & Unspiderable File Extensions
egomaniac




msg:419626
 5:08 am on Feb 18, 2002 (gmt 0)

As I start up a new linking campaign, I want to know what file extensions to avoid. If someone can't give me Google PR benefit, I don't want to give it them.

I thought I'd start this thread since I couldn't find the answer for a specific file type.

My specific question is this:
-If a site that use *.php file types links to me, will this be counted by the engines that care about links pointing at my page (i.e. Google).

My general question is this:
-What file extension types won't get spidered and counted as a link to my site if I swap with them.

 

rogerd




msg:419627
 2:36 pm on Feb 18, 2002 (gmt 0)

Hi, ego, I'd say there are a couple of issues involved. Not only must you consider the file extension, but how does one get to the page? I've seen link directories that require the user to use a search box - these links almost certainly will never get spidered. Others may have links from an index page that include a query string - if they are a hard link on a static page (or an apparently static page) these have a greater probability of getting spidered.

You can always do a Google advanced search to determine whether a particular site's links are getting spidered.

Also, don't forget about the value of good link in generating direct traffic. I'm all for high page ranks, but I've obtained links from sites with average or below-average page rank that generate hits every day. I'd be far happier to have 500 visits a day coming from links on a hundred or two hundred other sites than from a #1 position that could get blown away overnight due to an algo change, a database error, a poorly tuned spam filter, etc.

rpking




msg:419628
 2:47 pm on Feb 18, 2002 (gmt 0)

If you are specifically concerned with Google PR, then check the PR of the links page you are hoping to be listed on. If it has a non-zero PR, then you can be sure it is spiderable.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved