|Is reciprocal links a good or bad idea?|
Can't figure it out..
I have multiple sites that are ready to do a link exchange with our site..
As I have read before in WW. "Don't participate in reciprocal or in any link exchange programs".
I am all confused, our competitors have loads of link exchanges with other related sites and are doing very well on Google..
So, do you actually get penalized for this? If so why are my competitors doing so well?
Maybe they have lots of other plus points that compensate for the penalties - for the time being.
But as we see in BD, anything can happen.
If they are links that are beneficial for your visitors (ie, you arent picking up casino links for your hardware shop site ;)) and they arent a large percentage of your backlinks (no, I dont have a number for that, but definitely keep it under 50%) then you should be fine.
Will it help for Google rankings in any way?
If you are doing reciprocals with .gov websites, it will help tremendously. If you are doing it with some quality partners, that should be fine, too.
I do not believe reciprocal links by themselves will damage your rankings. In fact, they can indeed be beneficial. As long as you stay on target and avoid linking with crappy sites, I think they should be good. Just my opinion.
|Is reciprocal links a good or bad idea? |
It is both a good and bad idea, depending on how you define it. For instance the age old question, which came first, the chicken or the egg? can be answered differently depending on your definition of a chicken egg. If a chicken egg is an egg that was laid by a chicken, the the chicken came first, and if a chicken egg is an egg which contains a chicken, then the egg came first.
If you define reciprocal links to be the exchange of links between sites who have each carefully reviewed related sites or those potentially helpful to their site's visitors, then such reciprocal links will help your site. They have helped since the SEs started using link analysis, and will as long as link analysis is used to rank web pages.
On the other hand we can define reciprocal links quite differently, for people, having seen that the above form of reciprocal links helps sites, have sought to exploit the power of reciprocal links, and thus decide if contacting 10 sites for link exchange will get me 4 links, then if I contact 100,000 sites I should get just that many more links. It is quite easy to send out tens of thousands of emails per day, or even hundreds of thousands. The problem with this method is that you lose editorial discretion, you lose that individual contact.
If you take the former path (the laborious path) and get a lot of good quality links (from sites that care about who they link to) then your site should perform well, even if the only links you have are recips. If you choose the latter path (the automated spam path) and a get a lot of links from sites that will link to anyone, then those links are not going to count for much.
One of the problems in these forums is that some people, when they refer to reciprocal links, only refer to the latter. Doing reciprocal links properly is hard work and not many people do it right as there are just so many opportunities to slip from the righteous path to the virtueless path.
The chorus here, and at other forums is overwhelmingly that reciprocals don't work and they'll only hurt your site. The SERPs tell a much different story. I can name you dozens of industries that are dominated by sites that use reciprocal linking as their primary form of promotion, where 7 or 8 of the top 10 results will be those powered by recips.
Most of the older sites that have a lot of reciprocal links also have acquired many scraper, DMOZ clone and other one way links over time, so the recips are usually not a majority of their links anymore.
By the time Google had changed their algo to penalize excessive reciprocal linking, some sites that had employed a recip strategy were enjoying high rankings from a time when recips worked great, so they were getting unsolicited, scraper, directory and other assorted one way links, thus making the recips a relatively small proportion of their total links.
I personally have not seen any relatively new sites ranking for anything competitive just by acquiring hundreds or thousands or reciprocal links anymore. Matt Cutts in his blog is pretty clear that excessive reciprocal links can hurt your sites with Google, and based on my experience I believe that to be a pretty good tip to keep in mind.