homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: martinibuster

Link Development Forum

This 31 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 31 ( 1 [2]     
New Link Spamming Technique
...and it smells like Reciprocal Links?

WebmasterWorld Administrator martinibuster us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

Msg#: 2348 posted 11:06 pm on Mar 31, 2005 (gmt 0)

A while back many members were incredulous and outright insulted that I referred to reciprocal link exchanges as a form of search engine spam. Someone even called me cynical for contending that reciprocal link exchanges are not white hat.

I then took pains to demonstrate that Google's own website never condones reciprocal link exchanges as an acceptable activity, and that in *fact* Google never mentions reciprocal links at all. Although Google's website says it's good to gain links, Google never specifies to do it through reciprocal link exchanges. The only time Google mentions link exchanges is in the context of things a webmaster should not do.

Google's website does not state that reciprocal link exchanges are a legitimate webmaster activity. I'm addressing strictly what Google may or may not condone, I'm discussing Google's policy regarding Link Exchanges.

Now here is a quote from the recent Google Patent Filing:

A large spike in the quantity of back links may signal... attempts to spam a search engine (to obtain a higher ranking and, thus, better placement in search results) by exchanging links, purchasing links, or gaining links from documents without editorial discretion on making links...

So there you have it. Is exchanging links something Google frowns on?



10+ Year Member

Msg#: 2348 posted 11:32 pm on Apr 11, 2005 (gmt 0)

Exchanging links is as old as the internet (as we know it). It's nothing new and it's not all about "gaming" the SE. If I have a site about hand painted prayer shawls, it's perefectly natural that I may link to my synagogue and they might choose to link to me. Isn't the Inter-nut supposed to be about linking?

Webmasters should be able to get traffic from somwhere besides unreliable/turbulant SERPs and Google Ads. Or is that the real issue? hmmmmm

I like the point about a new ad campaign. If someone decides to expand their web business and takes out a bunch of ads (text, banner, whatever) - then they are a spammer? puh-lease

This 31 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 31 ( 1 [2]
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved