goodroi
msg:408902 | 9:59 am on Jan 30, 2005 (gmt 0) |
885k is nothing. I regualrly see pages over 1mb and sometimes over 2mb. I do not seek these pages out, because there are better pages to seek. The reason why people are still signing these pages is because they are in a database and are automatically signing it. As for the 101k limit, you can go past that quite a bit and search engines will still give you some benefit.
|
GranPops
msg:408903 | 11:09 am on Jan 30, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Hi again,
Maybe I was too narrow minded on the 101k, but over 96% of our traffic comes from Google.
Would be interested to know of a commercial site with a 1mb links page.
|
chrisnrae
msg:408904 | 2:04 pm on Jan 30, 2005 (gmt 0) |
>>>but over 96% of our traffic comes from Google Unasked for two cents a bit off topic... that would worry me. I definitely would try and spread that number between some of the other engines and work on gaining new traffic via other sources.
|
GranPops
msg:408905 | 5:25 pm on Jan 30, 2005 (gmt 0) |
We are No.1 in Yahoo and also now in MSN so it would appear that the 70,000 a month who use our search terms stick to G.
|
chrisnrae
msg:408906 | 12:05 am on Jan 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Wow gp - thats pretty unusual to be #1 in all three and still have G send 96% of the traffic IME. I'd need stock in tums ;-).
|
|
