| Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 18.104.22.168 |
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
|Become a Pro Member|
|Refusing linking script?|
Link was refused because it is a cgi link
| 3:12 pm on Oct 27, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Is there any proof that having automated links programs where the pages are dynmically created (
i.e. end in?page etc.) are not woth anything.
Somone emailed me and asked me to remove a link
because my linking system is automated.
How can I manage all these links on hand
edited html static pages?
| 3:20 pm on Oct 27, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Have you considered using mod_rewrite (on Apache) or ISAPI Rewrite (on IIS) to make the pages appear to be static?
| 3:57 pm on Oct 27, 2004 (gmt 0)|
I have heard of these. Unfortunately I have no
experience with this. Is this necessary?
I am on a windows server. What would I use for this?
Isn't apache linux/unix based?
I bought a third party script for this linking program.
| 6:02 pm on Oct 27, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Several of the 3rd party programs can set up static html pages and links instead of cgi or php.
I would guess that the feedback you are getting is a result of some pages in cgi based directories having been jacked. I'll sticky you an example.
| 6:06 pm on Oct 27, 2004 (gmt 0)|
Does this script generate pages with the link actually in the page e.g.
or does it generate a link that then passes through another page on your site e.g.
If it's the latter I suspect that's what the complaint was about.
I've removed a few links from my site when I've found partner sites using this method. It's a "send me PR while I avoid sending you any" scenario, not really very reciprocal.
All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved