homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.226.213.228
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: martinibuster

Link Development Forum

This 67 message thread spans 3 pages: < < 67 ( 1 2 [3]     
What's the fastest way to get incoming links?
Need Inbound Links in a Hurry
mig1234




msg:413379
 1:46 pm on Sep 10, 2004 (gmt 0)

In your experience, what is the fastest ways to get quality incomming links to website?

My site is about widget improvement and what I do is search on google phrases like:

“submit site” widgets
intitle:”submit site” widgets

This way I find some directories where I can submit my link, usually without returning link.

Can you recommend me faster ways?

[edited by: martinibuster at 4:24 pm (utc) on Sep. 10, 2004]
[edit reason] No specifics. Thanks. [/edit]

 

dauction




msg:413439
 2:21 pm on Oct 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

wiki links wont count in a matter of months ..dont even bother. It is quickly turning into one ofthe most abused projects on the web .Even more so than DMOZ!

You simply cannnot turn over projects to the inmates..it's really that simple!

rj87uk




msg:413440
 2:46 pm on Oct 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

..dont even bother

Im sure this is not the right attitude to take when doing link development.

- If it takes less than 5 minutes and a chance you might get a link then go for it no harm done!

- Im sure you will find pages of content that you can add to and in return get a link - pages thats not abused.

RJ

dauction




msg:413441
 3:10 pm on Oct 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

The "harm" is that you are doing it for LINKS ..not for the betterment of Wiki results..
That's the Harm..

Look it's just a current fad/gimmick and Google isnt going to let it ride long..

Looks good now but in 2 months everyone will be #*$!ing about it.. you watch

did google really not count those links..wowo I spent x amount of time on stuffing wiki with my links when I could have spent the time gettting quality links type stuff

rj87uk




msg:413442
 3:38 pm on Oct 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

The "harm" is that you are doing it for LINKS ..not for the betterment of Wiki results..

If you are adding some quality information to the page then they will get more information, making it better. he link is a plus, if it stays on.

Looks good now but in 2 months everyone will be #*$!ing about it.. you watch

Im sure in 2 months time it will be full of links, but then again it will have more information and more links to where we will find more information...

wowo I spent x amount of time on stuffing wiki with my links when I could have spent the time gettting quality links type stuff

Well, I think a wiki like IS a quality link. Think about it ok it might not be the best... But it will be on topic, some people read the wiki information and they might click through to find your information.

As long as people add more useful information to it im sure it will help people. Im not saying go ahead spammers: spam but I dont think '2 months' later it will be gone.

stuffing wiki with my links

Im sure some people do that, but as long as they add information the site should stay useful.

:) RJ

dickbaker




msg:413443
 10:08 pm on Oct 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

After reading some of the posts here (and getting a nice PM), I went to some wiki pages that relate to my niche. I added links to pages on my site that offered further information. It didn't seem like spamming to me.

Google has indexed some of those pages in a matter of days, and nobody on the wiki site has seen fit to remove the link, which tells me "it's a good thing."

martinibuster




msg:413444
 11:27 pm on Oct 20, 2004 (gmt 0)

>>>Looks good now but in 2 months everyone will be #*$!ing about it.. you watch...

The Wiki spamming thing has been going on for awhile now. I wouldn't get too upset about it being discussed in a public forum. Just a sign that like other methods of site promotion, it's reaching critical mass.

SlyOldDog




msg:413445
 11:39 am on Oct 21, 2004 (gmt 0)

It's a bit of a shame don't you think? Such a good resource and it's being defaced by idiot webmasters.

The penalty should be castration.

This 67 message thread spans 3 pages: < < 67 ( 1 2 [3]
Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Marketing and Biz Dev / Link Development
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved