| 10:18 pm on Sep 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Be careful you aren't been drawn in to a bad neighborhood
| 10:30 pm on Sep 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
It is quite tempting offer because his link pages has PR6
| 10:32 pm on Sep 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
still be careful did he offer to you or the other way round
| 10:33 pm on Sep 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
who is "HE"
| 10:35 pm on Sep 26, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Shak nailed it.
| 2:59 pm on Sep 27, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Agree with everything, but remember that in the "real" world good sites link to bad sites.
We look after some sites that I am sure link to bad sites and neighbhourhoods, but they also link to 1000's of good sites.
The web is built on chaos and so should your linking strategy. good/bad/clean/messy just do it on a massive scale.
| 12:05 am on Sep 28, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Being penalized being linked to a bad neighbhourhood is a myth. More Google paranoia. There is no way Google will take the 1,000 sites that link to one garbage site out of their index. If they did, they would soon have a very limited index. Part of Google's strategy is to have as many possible sites indexed.
I am sure Yahoo and DMOZ have a few bad neighbhourhoods in their index. Why not knock them out?
At worst the link will not count.
| 12:08 am on Sep 28, 2003 (gmt 0)|
I got to agree with jdancing on this one. I'd say be careful, but not paranoid.
| 12:51 am on Sep 28, 2003 (gmt 0)|
Like Zapastia, I also vote for jdancing