| 7:48 pm on Jan 15, 2001 (gmt 0)|
Seems to be the same as DavesEngine.com
You might wish to Email Dave
| 7:53 pm on Jan 15, 2001 (gmt 0)|
Ahh the dreaded DavesEngine. They have been planning on creating a search engine for some time now, though I haven't seen any more progress.(not that there ever was any).
Edited by: msgraph
| 8:01 pm on Jan 15, 2001 (gmt 0)|
Thanks for the extremely quick response.
I'll send an e-mail to davesengine and let you know what type of response...if any, that I receive.
| 8:10 pm on Jan 15, 2001 (gmt 0)|
While you are at it Jennifer, you might want to ask him how a page that has no links going anywhere can generate any traffic at all. If you get an answer, be sure to post it under "Breaking Search Engines News" as I am sure that the entire community here at WmW would like to know how that incredible feat can be accomplished. Could you also post a line from your client's log showing the referral? That would be extremely interesting.
| 10:03 pm on Jan 15, 2001 (gmt 0)|
Actually, I've been spidered by a number of "bots" coming from petersnews and davesengine...but i have yet to see why they spidered me at all.
I decided to give them some very, very spammy looking pages, just in case they are up to what i would be doing, were the situation reversed...
Seriously, though, they are the biggest no show...why spider and say you're putting together an engine, if you aren't actually going to do it?
| 9:53 am on Jan 16, 2001 (gmt 0)|
A previous mention [webmasterworld.com]. I think that each of these is merely a nom de plume for some other engine.
| 4:59 pm on Jan 16, 2001 (gmt 0)|
below is the referral line from the log file for petersnews:
news12.petersnews.com - - [04/Jan/2001:15:22:43 -0500] "GET /robots.txt HTTP/1.1" 404 216 "-" "user-1.petersnews.com"
All the other referral lines from petersnews are similar.
They followed the links through the whole site....including trying to check some password protected folders. Rather interesting for a search engine that isn't.