| 12:44 am on Aug 25, 2000 (gmt 0)|
Definitely Alta Vista;
Reverse Lookup Result: add-url2.sv.alta-vista.net
Lookup Result: 18.104.22.168
Domain registry query for:alta-vista.net:
Whois Server Version 1.1
Domain names in the .com, .net, and .org domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to [internic.net...]
for detailed information.
Domain Name: ALTA-VISTA.NET
Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.
Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Referral URL: www.networksolutions.com
Name Server: NS2.ALTAVISTA.COM
Name Server: NS1.ALTAVISTA.COM
Name Server: NS3.ALTAVISTA.COM
Updated Date: 17-feb-2000
| 3:46 am on Aug 25, 2000 (gmt 0)|
this is what it brought up @ arin...
10 Cathy Place
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Netblock: 22.214.171.124 - 126.96.36.199
Vixie, Paul (PV15-ARIN) paul@VIX.COM
+1 415 747 0204
Domain System inverse mapping provided by:
Record last updated on 01-Jun-1999.
Database last updated on 24-Aug-2000 17:56:57 EDT.
| 7:06 pm on Aug 25, 2000 (gmt 0)|
Great catch roscoepico! So did they crawl through your site? How did you catch them? Did they go through the robots.txt file?
| 9:14 pm on Aug 25, 2000 (gmt 0)|
Yeah, I see your point and it does make you think, doesn't it? Why couldn't it be fake?
The reason I thought it authentic is that on a traceroute the last hop before hitting the a-v.net domain is mibh.net,
so given that, there just seemed to be too many things that pointed to an authentic AV spider. Plus Paul Vixie is known to be associated with mibh and they are known to spider on behalf of AV.
I wasen't being smug. I hope it didn't come across that way.
| 10:11 pm on Aug 25, 2000 (gmt 0)|
Check out www.alta-vista.net [alta-vista.net]. It is a fully functional face to AV. The searches are directed internally [alta-vista.net].
| 7:31 am on Aug 26, 2000 (gmt 0)|
Paul Vixie, alias (mibh.net), is/are supposedly the third party group that is responsible for AV's anti-spam campaign.. They were crawling last winter w/ variable user agents, sometimes even as a "Perl" script.......
But the Class "C" -> 128.177.243 is the dead give away.... Many thought they were comparing page stats to the actual AV crawl of the URL.. We've been showing both the identical content for some time now....