SEOMike
msg:1571017 | 9:28 pm on Jan 28, 2005 (gmt 0) |
I have deployed Norton on about 20 computers and have not had any real issues. The only one that made me mad was that Norton got a little buggy once XP SP 2 was installed. I upgraded Norton to the 2005 version, and haven't had a problem since. My vote is for Norton.
|
bill
msg:1571018 | 7:43 am on Jan 29, 2005 (gmt 0) |
The people at Microsoft use NOD32. It gets top reviews and claims that since 1998 it was was the only tested product that has never missed a single 'In the Wild' virus. It's worth consideration.
|
Tropical Island
msg:1571019 | 5:31 pm on Jan 29, 2005 (gmt 0) |
PC Magazine's Editor's Choice is Norton.
|
vkaryl
msg:1571020 | 5:35 am on Jan 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
I'd opt for NOD32 over Norton any day - and regardless that MS uses it....
|
dom86
msg:1571021 | 11:20 am on Jan 31, 2005 (gmt 0) |
cool NOD32 does Network scans, thanks people for telling me about NOD32. I have a client who is very interested, on how best to protect the company’s computers. I’ll tell him about NOD32 thanks people. By the way I brought McAfee Internet Security Suite 2005 for my computers as Norton Internet Security 2005 and F-Secure Internet Security 2005 where both out of stock from the only place in the UK that sell OEM software eBuyer, eBay had it but way over priced. But I heard good things about McAfee from my friend in Belfast so I brought it, should come today. Thanks Posters Regards
Dominic Naylor
|
|
