Zips
msg:1612841 | 12:32 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Your right! Different Link numbers on www and www2
|
backus
msg:1612842 | 12:38 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
I can confirm 1 google update. Things are looking good on www2.
|
maccas
msg:1612843 | 12:40 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Yes, so far 1 more site back from pr0 :)
|
Chris_R
msg:1612844 | 12:42 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
I would have to agree
|
Beach
msg:1612845 | 12:42 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Sure has - getting a cached view of my site on www2 from May 1st and 2nd. And my positions are dancing !!!!
|
Iguana
msg:1612846 | 12:33 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
It's happening - Yahoo backward links down 7000 and my site up to 192! <edit>I lost the race to spot the update- see topic below</edit>
|
korkus2000
msg:1612847 | 12:35 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
confirmed here. Definitly out of sinc.
|
jimmykav
msg:1612848 | 12:38 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
No difference in link count here I am afraid. update: yes something going on. Somtimes when I do a link check google returns Your search - link:<x> - did not match any documents. (edited by: jimmykav at 1:01 pm (utc) on May 24, 2002)
|
brotherhood of LAN
msg:1612849 | 12:38 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
confirmed BIG changes here
|
TMK
msg:1612850 | 12:42 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Something is going down.
my main site is jumping from PR0-PR6 (hope I dont loose PR, took me 5 months to get it back last time I lost it) Regards
|
lazerzubb
msg:1612851 | 12:46 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
First update glitch:
The "Similar pages"
sometimes have space
Like this: [ More results from www.webmasterworld.com ] Similar pages Not right under the [more] as is should be :)
|
agerhart
msg:1612852 | 12:48 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Definite update....seeing some good movements. ;)
|
backus
msg:1612853 | 12:50 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Lost one or two links, even though the links are still there, they are not shown on Google. Hasn't upset my site any though. Site fluctuating from Grey out to PR5.
|
brotherhood of LAN
msg:1612854 | 12:50 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Im worried. Although most rankings are where they should be, it doesnt seem to be taking into account my own pages when doing a link:site.com is anyone else seeing this or am i headed towards thin ice??
|
lazerzubb
msg:1612855 | 12:50 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
The have tighten the LINK commando even more, it seems.
on www, google have 271.000 inbound links with LINK:
with the new index
210.000 inbound links with LINK: Correct me if i am wrong but i don't think Google ususaly increases it's links all the time right.
|
diddlydazz
msg:1612856 | 12:51 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
YEP Nice One Lazerzubb Here we go again !!! :) dazz
|
liquidstar
msg:1612857 | 12:53 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
I'm BACK! I would like to first thank Google for making my site once again profitable. Also, thank Webmaster World for getting me through the tough times of not being listed. My wife, my parents, fellow webmasters. Thank you all.
|
Brett_Tabke
msg:1612858 | 12:54 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
>space in The "Similar pages" Google's been playing with the display somewhat of url's. Evidently to thwart bots. Notice some of the urls are display www.domain.com/foo /bar with an extra space in the url.
|
backus
msg:1612859 | 12:57 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
BoL, seeing that as well! Why is it some of you have 200,000 links? I have about 6 inbound links on one of my sites and still have a PR7 and have placement. (Not site in profile.)
|
TMK
msg:1612860 | 12:57 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
well my main site is bop'n in and out like last time I lost my PR.. damn I hope, this is just a part of the dance. Dont want to go for another 5 months in the COLD. Regards
TMK
|
backus
msg:1612861 | 1:01 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Errr... Just went to our homepage (corporate), which is normally PR5, and it was PR8. Sat there in shock for a few seconds. Did a refresh and it was back at PR5. I know some may say that it was a leftover PR from the last page I visited, but it was a fresh browser window. Is this a sign of good things to come? Me thinks yes!
|
Dusted
msg:1612862 | 1:01 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Is the following usual for the google dance? On www3 results for a "mysite" search: -Main title of mysite
-Description
-Category
-url (All listing properly) But then for the rest of the [more results for mysite] the results just show the url, no page title or snippet of the content! :/ E.g. www.mysite.com/apage/
[similar pages] (repeated over and over again)
|
lazerzubb
msg:1612863 | 1:04 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
They seem to mix up results pretty much, i am seeing sites with good listings for competitive keywords ( >1 Million ) which don't have the keyword anyware and still appears top 10.
Also they seem to rank Guestbook link way to high.
Also more weight on the domain it seems.
|
backus
msg:1612864 | 1:06 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
I think once those results the main server, then they'll have cleaned out the trash.
|
The Toecutter
msg:1612865 | 1:09 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Yup! :)
|
chinook
msg:1612866 | 1:12 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
It looks like the google directory is also going to update. Seeing new serp pages pointing to google directory even though those listings don't exist yet in the directory.
|
JonB
msg:1612867 | 1:15 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
hm all sites stil pr 0 BUT one page on my main domain has pr 2!!! unbelivable, ithough this this doamin was dead for google. this gives me hope. i competelly cleaned my sites some month or two ago so it is possbile that they are still not calculated in latest update but this one small pr 2 gives me hope.:) Jon (edited by: JonB at 1:18 pm (utc) on May 24, 2002)
|
baldrix
msg:1612868 | 1:17 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Yes, my site went into ODP this month, and it's now showing up in the Google Directory search - but the site isn't in the directory listings yet. So there's some more happenings to happen yet!
|
chris_f
msg:1612869 | 1:18 pm on May 24, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Results are looking slightly different for my keywords, however can someone explain this. GB has not been in my logs and my new site is not included. Surly, if this were an update GB would have visited.
|
| This 72 message thread spans 3 pages: 72 ( [1] 2 3 ) > > |
|
|
