WebGuerrilla
msg:1609766 | 3:20 am on Feb 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Hi JuDDer, Here are a couple of older threads that covered poison words. [webmasterworld.com...] [webmasterworld.com...] [webmasterworld.com...]
|
JuDDer
msg:1609767 | 10:20 am on Feb 26, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Thanks for the links, WebGuerrilla.
|
GoogleGuy
msg:1609768 | 2:31 am on Feb 27, 2002 (gmt 0) |
As opposed to "Google rulez!!", which is hard-wired to add 0.001 to any sites PageRank ;)
|
nutsandbolts
msg:1609769 | 11:40 am on Feb 27, 2002 (gmt 0) |
*evil grin* /me starts to add <h1>Google rulez</h1> to all of my sites ;)
|
Beachboy
msg:1609770 | 4:48 pm on Feb 27, 2002 (gmt 0) |
Yo, can we cross-link the daylights out of sites so long as we have <h1>Google rulez</h1> on each index page? ;-)
|
ciml
msg:1609771 | 7:38 pm on Feb 27, 2002 (gmt 0) |
In Google, poison words don't necessarily affect the page they're on. An example from the Open Directory: this page [dmoz.org] doesn't get the expected PageRank from this page [dmoz.org]. The same goes for many other pages using the word "guestbook" heavily; they just don't show in backlinks any more. "forum" and "links" seem OK, though. Anyone found any others? Calum
|
|
