stavs
msg:1607410 | 11:53 pm on Sep 17, 2001 (gmt 0) |
can anyone refer me to a reference point that I can use to see the date of cache. I imagine there to be some sites with a clock which freezes when cached, which one can refer to??? or am I off the beaten track?
|
grnidone
msg:1607411 | 1:49 am on Sep 18, 2001 (gmt 0) |
Stavs: look at the cache. [google.com...]
|
Jill
msg:1607412 | 4:09 pm on Sep 18, 2001 (gmt 0) |
I still see no movement for any of the sites we watch. Brett I wonder if they decided that since you guys figured out the New Moon update thing that they have to come up with something new. ;)
|
Beagle
msg:1607413 | 8:42 pm on Sep 18, 2001 (gmt 0) |
hi Jill, I think you may have hit on something! I've been watching my keywords / site for the last couple of days and was starting to get worried when they were not moving.. I guess I can be happy werent going down though! :)
|
click watcher
msg:1607414 | 9:23 pm on Sep 18, 2001 (gmt 0) |
maybe jill, but how about this theory ...
people who regularily keep checking keywords from the same ip address, maybe google has a game with them and jiggs the www2 and www3 results around a bit just for fun.
|
toolman
msg:1607415 | 9:28 pm on Sep 18, 2001 (gmt 0) |
Maybe they haven't started to update yet?
|
agerhart
msg:1607416 | 9:33 pm on Sep 18, 2001 (gmt 0) |
but how about this theory ...
people who regularily keep checking keywords from the same ip address, maybe google has a game with them and jiggs the www2 and www3 results around a bit just for fun. I doubt that they would go to this extent.......
|
Jill
msg:1607417 | 12:10 am on Sep 19, 2001 (gmt 0) |
toolman stating the obvious ;) No doubt and I don't check every 2 minutes - not that I think it would make any difference to google one way or another. I just don't have the time! I am quite sure the delay in the update might have something to do with this past weeks happenings.
|
click watcher
msg:1607418 | 12:51 am on Sep 19, 2001 (gmt 0) |
>>I doubt that they would go to this extent....... yeah i'm sure your right there was just teasing really.
|
Brett_Tabke
msg:1607419 | 2:06 pm on Sep 19, 2001 (gmt 0) |
I wouldn't put it past them. If small sites are having a problem with rogue spiders, imagine the load that search engines must experience. It would keep you up at night designing ways to counter the threat to the whole system. I think the events in New York and the subsequent news spidering probably put their schedule out of whack.
|
Slade
msg:1607420 | 8:58 pm on Sep 19, 2001 (gmt 0) |
One of my sites dropped off the page it was on to the next page... on 2 different search terms. EDIT:
I just also noticed the cache has been updated, and it shows September 19, 2001
|
Jill
msg:1607421 | 10:14 pm on Sep 19, 2001 (gmt 0) |
I just checked a few of the sites we watch and some of them have updated cache as of today and some do not so it is possibly on the move now.
|
stace
msg:1607422 | 1:02 am on Sep 20, 2001 (gmt 0) |
Hi guys, My index is finally updated to Sept 19...after 2 weeks or so of the REALLY old index replacing the regular old one-- but none of my other pages is updated. best to all,
S
|
Jill
msg:1607423 | 11:36 am on Sep 20, 2001 (gmt 0) |
Okay I give up (it's about time huh!) Our cache is now back to the old stuff on any of the sites that changed yesterday. I guess it's like trying to lose weight and you keep stepping on the scale...
|
caine
msg:1607424 | 12:37 pm on Sep 20, 2001 (gmt 0) |
I can't see anything, the site has dramatically changed, and the ranks across all of the www's are the same still, everything is the same, cached 1.8.01
|
Slade
msg:1607425 | 1:42 pm on Sep 20, 2001 (gmt 0) |
My site that had been updated in the cache is now back to an old copy(don't know the date, didn't have it on there then). Sigh... Just as well, I had lost a few points anyway :P
|
mack
msg:1607426 | 7:03 pm on Sep 23, 2001 (gmt 0) |
dam wierd this. there is no diference in any of the www's unualy there is a slight fluxuation throught the month but... there is none...what is going on here. :(
Continued: [webmasterworld.com...]
|
| This 47 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 47 ( 1 [2] ) |
|
|
