emodo
msg:371394 | 5:20 pm on Aug 22, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Easiest to use "out of box" I would argue is articlelive. But at $239 it is certainly not the cheapest. My computer illerate mum figured it out instantly. Out of the free CMSs I think Mambo takes the cake as the easiest "out of box".
|
jschmitz
msg:371395 | 2:06 pm on Aug 25, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Hi! I've used contribute extensively for documentation and content publishing sites. It's a little kludgy to set up, but is very wysiwig. I highly reccomend it! j
|
pmkpmk
msg:371396 | 4:20 pm on Aug 25, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Good functionality, quick start, small learning curve: Mambo
Superb functionality, slow start, steep learning cuver: Typo3
|
NetGoonie
msg:371397 | 10:11 pm on Aug 25, 2005 (gmt 0) |
Thanks everyone...I think the best solution for this person is contribute. Although I plan on using mambo for another large site next month.
|
bill
msg:371398 | 11:16 pm on Aug 26, 2005 (gmt 0) |
You might want to hold off on the Mambo idea for a bit. Just recently all the core developers abandoned the project. There is a bit of a rift in the community. You may want to look at that before you decide to go ahead. Read more: Mambo Foundation has been established [webmasterworld.com]
|
|
