| 11:17 am on Aug 2, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Either should be fine but I got a feeling that the keyword-keyword-keyword style will be frowned upon eventually by search engines.
| 11:18 am on Aug 2, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Also the fact its quite ugly :)
| 1:51 pm on Aug 2, 2005 (gmt 0)|
|Also the fact its quite ugly :) |
| 2:06 pm on Aug 2, 2005 (gmt 0)|
ahh.screw.it/who-cares-how-long-a-url-is-as-long-as-it-has-keywords-in.it <- Server Parsed
Anyway you get the point, ugly URL's dont do anyone favours, unless you add a bookmark link or something, nobody is ever going to really remember what the URL is that way.
| 4:01 pm on Aug 2, 2005 (gmt 0)|
Changing the subject ever so slightly; which is better:
| 4:05 pm on Aug 2, 2005 (gmt 0)|
| 4:11 pm on Aug 2, 2005 (gmt 0)|
why do you need .html?
| 8:04 am on Aug 5, 2005 (gmt 0)|
I personally don't think you do need .html and I prefer to see urls of site.com/foo/bar/foo/
why do you think that is the best solution?