homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.196.201.253
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Webmaster General
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: phranque & physics

Webmaster General Forum

    
Duplicate Content Penalty
Hows it work?
Livenomadic




msg:338583
 8:04 pm on Sep 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

I have long believed in the duplicate content penalty, that is: When the majority of the content on two seperate webpages (on different sites) is the same, the one with the higher PR will be shown and the other one will not.

However, last week for university I was required to read "The Roots of Muslim Rage" by Bernard Lewis, originally published in 1990.

Here is my Google search for "The Roots of Muslim Rage" [google.com]

As becomes plainly obvious with the results, on the first page of results, 8 of 10 pages are displaying the ariticle, and ALL have atleast some PR:

Listing 1: PageRank 6 (Possible Authority Site)
Listing 2: PageRank 4 (Possible Authority Site)
Listing 3: PageRank 4 (Not Authority Site)
Listing 4: PageRank 3 (Not Authority Site)
Listing 5: PageRank 3 (Not Authority Site)
Listing 6: <Not the Article>
Listing 7: PageRank 1 (Not Authority Site)
Listing 8: PageRank 2 (Not Authority Site)
Listing 9: PageRank 3 (Possible Authority Site)
Listing 10: <Not the Article>

More interesting still, the first listing (Atlantic Monthly) is where the article was originally published. And the 9th listing acutally links to the first listing.

Therefore, google ISN'T penalizing these pages for showing the same content.

Comments? Explainations? Other Examples? Lets see if we can get to the bottom of this!

 

Brett_Tabke




msg:338584
 8:48 pm on Sep 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

The page found first wins. PR has *nothing* to do with dupe content.

Custodian




msg:338585
 10:53 pm on Sep 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

Brett,
Does this mean you are agreeing with the statement that there is no duplicate page penalty?

I've been trying to figure this one out too.

Brett_Tabke




msg:338586
 10:57 pm on Sep 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

no. I am saying that the 2nd page found will get the downgrade.

Livenomadic




msg:338587
 11:04 pm on Sep 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

Interesting, only a "downgrade"?

So many webmasters here talk about dupconpen (my word) as something that wipes your site back to PR 0.

Not sayings they or you are right..

Custodian




msg:338588
 11:06 pm on Sep 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

If "PR has *nothing* to do with dupe content." then how does a site get penalized for duplicate content?
Thanks for your input.

Custodian




msg:338589
 11:09 pm on Sep 14, 2004 (gmt 0)

Maybe I'm missing something here. Isn't a lower PR a downgrade?

Custodian




msg:338590
 2:21 am on Sep 15, 2004 (gmt 0)

I went back through several of the past threads on this subject and it seems that as long as the pages are not exactly the same -- same links, navigations, title headers, footers etc, having duplicate content is not a big issue.

I am gathering that Google and the other search engines have a tough time scrutinizing down to the paragraph and sentence levels.

If I am wrong, someone please point me in the right direction.

Livenomadic




msg:338591
 2:28 am on Sep 15, 2004 (gmt 0)

I'm interested in this too.

1. Since I have been thinking about using Wikipedia parts in my articles.

2. Since I have been thinking of syndicating my articles (Not RSS, just regular) on other sites.

3Mice




msg:338592
 5:26 am on Sep 15, 2004 (gmt 0)

Hi,
You might want read this:-

[webmasterworld.com...]

I posted something similar to your question and got interesting replies

karmov




msg:338593
 12:18 pm on Sep 15, 2004 (gmt 0)

Maybe I'm missing something here. Isn't a lower PR a downgrade?

Yes, a lower PR would be a downgrade, but there are over a hundred other factors that affect your position in the SERPs. If any one of them gets downgraded, your position in the SERPs could drop. PR is only a single factor amongst many. PR is not the only measure to go by.

Custodian




msg:338594
 1:24 pm on Sep 15, 2004 (gmt 0)

3Mice - Thanks for the link.

No definate conclusions, but yet another area where there are lots of varied experiences.

prairie




msg:338595
 12:47 pm on Oct 12, 2004 (gmt 0)

I don't think the "first page in wins" situation is ideal, let alone fair.

Surely a page with on-topic inbound links would tend to be the best source of information.

Older pages would naturally tend to have more links either internally from a growing site or from outside sources.

What is the real-life experience?

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Webmaster General
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved