homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Webmaster General
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: phranque

Webmaster General Forum

"Net Neutrality" Threatened?
How real is this threat?

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

Msg#: 11888 posted 11:59 am on Jun 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

I admit I am new to this subject and not even sure if this is the right place to post, but how big a threat to us small publishers is this push in Congress by the telecoms (AT&T, Comcast, etc.) to make sites pay a fee so they will download quickly on the user's end, in essence creating a fast lane with a toll? Those of us who won't be able to pay the fees (I imagine they will be hefty since the telecoms want to make as much money as they possibly can) are going to get pushed to the side of the road and no one will be able to download our sites.

Question...how real is this threat? It could potentially change the internet as we know it, and even hurt a site like Google that depends on thousands of small advertisers and publisers.



WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

Msg#: 11888 posted 12:28 pm on Jun 3, 2006 (gmt 0)

It is hugely in the interest of telecoms companies to direct people to "walled garden" content that they control - it is a potentially much more profitable business than telecoms.

Two examples: on-line services (like Prestel in Britain) that existed before then net, WAP services that usually only give access to sites approved by the telco.

Having failed to interest anyone in those services, what better than to warp the net into one?

The threat to small publishers is very different from the threat to the likes of Google. For them the risk is smaller profits. We face the additional risk that the level of fees involved may be too high for small players - we might be inaccessible, or so slowed that our sites become unusable.

Fortunately at the moment the threat seems to be receding. If you are in the US and you agree it is a threat tell your elected representatives so.


5+ Year Member

Msg#: 11888 posted 9:28 am on Jun 4, 2006 (gmt 0)

I think that this might be an own goal for the USA. Internet businesses in other countries would benefit from the harm done to small publishers in the USA.


WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

Msg#: 11888 posted 4:37 am on Jun 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

I do not think so Nybo, because they will throttle the bandwidth at the vistor's end, not the websites.

So our US vistors will still see our relative performance drop against the sites that stump up the money.

Our non-US visitors will see no difference.

It may still be an own goal for the US in the long run - it will make life more expensive for innovative web start-ups and small publishers in the US, making US based websites less interesting in the long run. However that does not really benefit anyone.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Webmaster General
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved