homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 50.16.112.199
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Advertising / Paid Inclusion Engines and Topics
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Paid Inclusion Engines and Topics Forum

  posting off  
Would this be considered duplicate content?
I am so stupid
flobaby

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2488 posted 7:38 am on Feb 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

I redirected a couple ghost URLs (pages gone for over a year but still spidered by Ink) to my index page. In searches, Ink lists those URLs with the title and description from my index, though the actual index page is completely MIA.

I just realized that since it's listing those URLs with the index content, Ink might be treating them as multiple copies of my index, which could have created a penalty for duplicate content. Does this sound possible?

 

panic

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2488 posted 7:27 pm on Feb 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

I just realized that since it's listing those URLs with the index content, Ink might be treating them as multiple copies of my index, which could have created a penalty for duplicate content. Does this sound possible?

Sounds very possible. The purpose of the multiple content editorial action is to not only stop people from stealing content off of external sites, but to stop people from using the same content and optimizing it differently on multiple pages.

flobaby

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2488 posted 7:40 pm on Feb 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

Thanks Panic. If this is true, then that might be the reason a lot of other people's pages are MIA. We could all be the victim of innocent redirects that Ink misinterprets as duplication. Wouldn't be a problem if Ink didn't keep old urls in their database indefinitely. Poop.

panic

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2488 posted 7:45 pm on Feb 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

We could all be the victim of innocent redirects that Ink misinterprets as duplication. Wouldn't be a problem if Ink didn't keep old urls in their database indefinitely.

Did you use 301 redirects?

flobaby

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2488 posted 7:46 pm on Feb 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

Yep, I sure did.

panic

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2488 posted 7:50 pm on Feb 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

Yep, I sure did.

Did you use a meta refresh, or robots.txt?

flobaby

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2488 posted 7:51 pm on Feb 19, 2004 (gmt 0)

robots.txt
And it validates correctly.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Advertising / Paid Inclusion Engines and Topics
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved