Lundorff
msg:20815 | 9:54 am on Dec 8, 2003 (gmt 0) |
No one?
|
panic
msg:20816 | 7:31 pm on Dec 8, 2003 (gmt 0) |
| someone recommended business.com but when accessing sites from their directory a frame with 3 ads is placed on top. Why pay at a minimum of 99$ for this? Or am I missing something? |
|
If buisness.com visitors are who you're targeting, then why not pay the $99? :)
|
sem4u
msg:20817 | 7:46 pm on Dec 8, 2003 (gmt 0) |
| If buisness.com visitors are who you're targeting, then why not pay the $99? |
|
Quite true. There are many bargains like this to be had if the business.com category receives a lot of traffic. :)
|
panic
msg:20818 | 7:52 pm on Dec 8, 2003 (gmt 0) |
And besides, $99 is fairly meager. Just be sure to track conversions and/or ROI to see if it's for you. If it doesn't work out, $99 is only a slap on the wrist.
|
Lundorff
msg:20819 | 7:55 am on Dec 9, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Thank you for feedback. Yes there might be some traffic in the appropriated category but I would also have liked it to give some PR/show as backlink. In its current state I doubt this would happen. Rgs
Lundorff
|
|
