homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 23.22.59.252
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Pubcon Platinum Sponsor 2014
Home / Forums Index / Advertising / Paid Inclusion Engines and Topics
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Paid Inclusion Engines and Topics Forum

  posting off  
Position Tech, ineedhits or some other?
Which service do you prefer and why?
knotty

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2373 posted 5:41 pm on Nov 24, 2003 (gmt 0)

Just wondering which inclusion service is the best? or, are they all about the same?

Just want to get feedback before I plunk down the money.

Thanks!
knotty

 

oilman

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2373 posted 5:44 pm on Nov 25, 2003 (gmt 0)

Personally I would go with Position Tech. They're the main player.

ralent

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2373 posted 12:40 am on Nov 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

Right now I'm with Lycos InSite and I really had to dig around just to find a support address. My next site I'll most likely try Position Tech.

printerbase

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2373 posted 6:29 pm on Nov 27, 2003 (gmt 0)

I am thinking about using Lycos Insite because you get a discount if you go for both Fast and Inktomi.

Are all submission services not the same?
Don't they all just insert you URL's into the same database?

scottyman

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2373 posted 8:30 pm on Nov 27, 2003 (gmt 0)

Yes it's the same database, the question is I think does anyone have any merit over the other. I use Ineedhits and they are pretty good. I guess the Lycos is another option but since you can submit to Fast for free I don't see the benefit. I also though Lycos was harder to navigate etc.

DaveAtIFG

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2373 posted 9:57 pm on Nov 27, 2003 (gmt 0)

Umm... Fast and Ink are separate companies with unique privately owned databases.

Fast (more properly called AllTheWeb) and Ink both offer free submissions, Ink thru a few of the portals that use Ink data. The advantage to paid submissions is prompt and frequent spidering.

My opinions: This service is valuable for Ink since they are historically "sluggish" about spidering. Since AllTheWeb normally respiders their entire database within a few weeks, paid inclusion is of little value.

PositionTech was the first to offer this service and their service to me over 4+ years has been good enough that I haven't felt the need to explore other options.

scottyman

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2373 posted 7:02 pm on Nov 28, 2003 (gmt 0)

DaveAtIFG, I should have said, IneedHits and PositionTech submit to the same database, i.e they do the same thing.

SlyGuy

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2373 posted 10:45 pm on Nov 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

I'll add my voice to the PositionTech camp.

I've used them for about 2 years now and I'm very happy with their services.

CygnusX1

10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 2373 posted 10:51 pm on Nov 30, 2003 (gmt 0)

I use MarketLeap. I've only used them for 4 months, but I like the way they set up my stats pages. Also if I submit a clients website, I can keep his stats in a different folder on MarketLeap's website. This is great so I can show each customer what their stats are doing and not anyone else's.

CygnusX1

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Advertising / Paid Inclusion Engines and Topics
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved