seth_wilde
msg:26694 | 9:31 pm on Sep 30, 2003 (gmt 0) |
I'd go with what your head says...
|
agerhart
msg:26695 | 9:31 pm on Sep 30, 2003 (gmt 0) |
I wouldn't pay to be in AV until they start generating more traffic. Go with Fast.
|
skibum
msg:26696 | 4:46 pm on Oct 9, 2003 (gmt 0) |
I wouldn't pay to be in FAST either.
|
oLeon
msg:26697 | 9:36 am on Oct 10, 2003 (gmt 0) |
If you want to pay at all, choose FAST - it will be left as the only program.
|
caine
msg:26698 | 10:06 am on Oct 10, 2003 (gmt 0) |
Fast certainly is the only engine that is capable of giving G a run for its money, if the right steps are taking - i don't quite perceive what the heck yahoo are going to do with AV rather than dump it, but its one of the original names of the internet and still carries kudos - so maybe there are other plans at work. Certainly PFI has to be for fast.
|
tosho
msg:26699 | 12:50 am on Oct 20, 2003 (gmt 0) |
It doesn't matter which one you pay for, the feed goes to both of them
|
|
