homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.166.105.24
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Advertising / Paid Inclusion Engines and Topics
Forum Library, Charter, Moderator: open

Paid Inclusion Engines and Topics Forum

  posting off  
Is PFI in both Ink and LS counter-productive?
If so which is best?
NigelT




msg:16023
 8:29 pm on Jun 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

I believe I have read in earlier threads that it can be counter-productive, even harmful, to pay for inclusion in BOTH Ink and LS. Would someone kindly:

1. Confirm that I understood this correctly
2. Suggest which of the two it would be preferable to go with for paid inclusion

Thank you!

 

martinibuster




msg:16024
 8:43 pm on Jun 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

Depends on your competition. If more than one of your competitors is using LS, then you are pretty much obliged to follow suit. LS results come before Ink results.

If your competition isn't using LS, then use Ink PFI, and optimize those pages.

If you use Looksmart, use it for different pages than any INK pages you may already have, and be sure to target different keywords.

If you duplicate pages, what will happen is that the LS pages will be substituted for the INK pages because INK receives a monthly feed from them, and LS pages take precedence.

NigelT




msg:16025
 10:08 pm on Jun 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

Thanks, Martinibuster

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Advertising / Paid Inclusion Engines and Topics
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved