homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.226.21.57
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Local / Foo
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL & lawman

Foo Forum

    
New Airport Security Checks Require Your Electronic Device To Turn On
Make sure it's charged or it'll be confiscated
engine

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4685610 posted 11:24 am on Jul 7, 2014 (gmt 0)

This is an interesting one. I've started a journey with a fully charged device, however, i've also been travelling and the battery on my device has become exhausted. My charger was in the checked luggage so I was unable to recharge the device. That being the case, under the new regulations, I expect my discharged device to be confiscated.

Now i'm going to have to carry chargers, international power adaptors and charge leads in my hand luggage.

A number of airports, including Heathrow, have been ordered to intensify screening of electronic devices.

American transport officials said in a statement that passengers could be asked to switch on devices, and equipment that does not power up would not be allowed on board.New Airport Security Checks Require Your Electronic Device To Turn On [bbc.co.uk]

 

Shepherd



 
Msg#: 4685610 posted 1:58 pm on Jul 7, 2014 (gmt 0)

I remember a few years back they were doing that here in the U.S. but they stopped, not sure why though.

graeme_p

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4685610 posted 12:08 pm on Jul 8, 2014 (gmt 0)

I assume the US stopped doing it because it is annoying, unreasonable and pointless. So is most of the rest of airport security, but this is even more so.

lucy24

WebmasterWorld Senior Member lucy24 us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4685610 posted 6:35 pm on Jul 8, 2014 (gmt 0)

I assume the US stopped doing it because it is annoying, unreasonable and pointless.

?
Can anyone point to a single instance in human history where a governmental entity discontinued a practice purely because it was annoying, unreasonable and pointless?

Marshall

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4685610 posted 9:39 pm on Jul 8, 2014 (gmt 0)

Yes Congress. They stopped working because they are annoying, unreasonable and pointless.

:)

engine

WebmasterWorld Administrator engine us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



 
Msg#: 4685610 posted 11:56 am on Jul 9, 2014 (gmt 0)

I do find this whole thing rather strange. Surely, any object we take on board could be a threat, and it'll soon require travelling real light.

Shepherd



 
Msg#: 4685610 posted 7:01 pm on Jul 9, 2014 (gmt 0)

I do find this whole thing rather strange.


My guess is that it is easier to hide/disguise explosive material and an electric detonator in an electronic device than it would be in say a book or clothing.

graeme_p

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4685610 posted 8:02 am on Jul 11, 2014 (gmt 0)

Read some security blogs - there are lots of ways around airport security. Its mostly security theatre - ever wonder why procedures vary so much from country to country that much of what is checked at one end of a long haul flight is not at the other? All a terrorist needs do is board at the other end!

thecoalman

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 4685610 posted 2:24 pm on Jul 14, 2014 (gmt 0)

Surely, any object we take on board could be a threat,


The phone would have components or resemble components you might want to use in a bomb and the larger components like the battery or screen could be modified with an explosive. Plus nearly everyone has one so it wouldn't be out of the ordinary to have this device and checking each one is very cumbersome.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Local / Foo
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved