| 4:45 pm on May 9, 2014 (gmt 0)|
"I am Google"
WTF Scott has never met Matt?
| 6:58 pm on May 10, 2014 (gmt 0)|
Judging a group by its size is not only ignorant, but disrespectful.
Preface of "Google Code of Conduct":
"it’s also about doing the right thing more generally – following the law, acting honorably and treating each other with respect."
| 7:54 pm on May 10, 2014 (gmt 0)|
The article's headline seems to encapsulate all that is wrong with Google these days. Sounds like just another spoofer.
| 8:21 pm on May 10, 2014 (gmt 0)|
What an amazingly stupid thing to say. What if he was invited to address a closed session of the Cabinet?
| 8:34 pm on May 10, 2014 (gmt 0)|
A Reaper would explain his bad banners with a devastating insult before he ever made it back to the Chocolate Factory? :)
| 11:41 pm on May 10, 2014 (gmt 0)|
My post was a reply to the original quote, not to the immediately preceding post. I hope that was sufficiently clear ;)
| 11:49 pm on May 10, 2014 (gmt 0)|
lucy24, i read that as a reply to the original quote, but it reads kinda funny as a counterpoint.
unless you're jmcc... =8)
| 6:50 am on May 11, 2014 (gmt 0)|
I say many amazingly stupid things. :) Perhaps I could get a job in the Choclate Factory too.
Seriously though, these product "strategists" and other true believers scare me. They only seem more clueful because others have not learned how little they really know. Well at least it wasn't more waffle about Google's "Knowledge Graph" Wikipedia scraper.
| 9:05 am on May 11, 2014 (gmt 0)|
It's the "Google, c'est moi" line that scares me.
| 9:37 am on May 11, 2014 (gmt 0)|
These numpties tend to be like that whatever the company. I blame the clueless "technology" churnalists (press release recyclers). Since the churnalists haven't much of a clue about technology, they consider these people to be important because they turn up at so many events and seminars. The real reason is that they are sent to these events and seminars because they are so utterly useless at anything other than PR. (Cynical ex-editor mode.) They are the equivalent of a court astrologer and just as reliable at predicting future trends. :)
| 6:24 am on May 12, 2014 (gmt 0)|
This guy does not seem very good at PR...
Churnalism is not restricted to technology... its pretty bad in business and science as well, and probably more.