g1smd
msg:4536683 | 10:55 pm on Jan 16, 2013 (gmt 0) |
What's good for the corporation (firing thousands of staff and sending the work abroad) cannot be decried when the workers use the same methods.
Well played sir!
This is no "scam". It's business (though he could have been a bit more thoughtful about where it was outsourced to).
|
mack
msg:4536687 | 11:09 pm on Jan 16, 2013 (gmt 0) |
Promoting within the company ? :)
Mack.
|
phranque
msg:4537008 | 12:51 am on Jan 18, 2013 (gmt 0) |
this is so awesome.
|
lucy24
msg:4537031 | 6:19 am on Jan 18, 2013 (gmt 0) |
As we speak, company lawyers are poring over those six-figure programmers' employment contracts* and discovering to their dismay that it never actually says outright that the work has to be physically done by the individual human signing the contract. It probably says "responsible for..."
:: inescapable analogy to "billable hours" here ::
* There have to be written contracts so they can enforce things like non-compete clauses, non-disclosure and so on.
|
bhonda
msg:4537098 | 11:36 am on Jan 18, 2013 (gmt 0) |
I would assume the bit about posting your secure credentials to another country would be instant dismissal.
But I guess that's like the whole Al Capone/Tax evasion thing.
|
StoutFiles
msg:4537157 | 4:05 pm on Jan 18, 2013 (gmt 0) |
| I would assume the bit about posting your secure credentials to another country would be instant dismissal. |
|
Yeah, that's why he got fired.
He should be rehired instantly by a company that outsources their programming. He obviously has a knack for finding good programmers at little cost.
|
|
