homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.197.111.87
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / Local / Foo
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL & lawman

Foo Forum

    
Brazilian newspapers pull out of Google News
Lame_Wolf




msg:4510271
 10:35 pm on Oct 20, 2012 (gmt 0)

The papers say Google News refused to pay for content and was driving traffic away from their websites.

[bbc.co.uk...]

 

scooterdude




msg:4510272
 10:43 pm on Oct 20, 2012 (gmt 0)

Every one is getting more professional in how they view their web presence, less likely to accept airey fairy promises , and propositions that don't add up economically

Lame_Wolf




msg:4510274
 10:48 pm on Oct 20, 2012 (gmt 0)

You cannot blame the newspapers though. Google should remain as a search engine, not an imformation engine.

scooterdude




msg:4510279
 11:23 pm on Oct 20, 2012 (gmt 0)

Actually Its great !

They did a experiment from which they quantified the pros and cons, nice one

incrediBILL




msg:4510290
 11:58 pm on Oct 20, 2012 (gmt 0)

Google should remain as a search engine, not an imformation engine.


It makes no difference because as both a search or information engine, they get first crack at ad dollars being spent on their face time with the visitor, not the newspaper. I've said many times before that this is why webmasters don't want cache, site previews, none of that junk because it gives Google more visitor and ad revenue opportunities and takes away from the webmaster. This is why NOARCHIVE should be SOP procedure for all websites to stop this practice but many webmasters idiotically defend their use of cache pages. Besides, Bing and Yahoo are also making the information play and Google has to do it to remain competitive.

However, people want a one-stop shop to find all their news and it's driven by customer demand. I like to see all my news sources at a glance, not going to each site one at a time. If the newspapers can't figure out how to get some revenue share out of that then too bad for them.

Lame_Wolf




msg:4510293
 12:41 am on Oct 21, 2012 (gmt 0)

I don't just mean this, but Google in general. They have taken away visitors from different sectors, translate, dictionaries etc.

lucy24




msg:4510303
 1:19 am on Oct 21, 2012 (gmt 0)

This is why NOARCHIVE should be SOP procedure for all websites to stop this practice

If everyone said "noarchive" then g### would simply stop honoring the directive. Same thing with "expires" headers. They're just sending information to the browser. The browser-- which for these purposes includes the googlebot-- can choose how to act on the information.

lexipixel




msg:4510327
 4:25 am on Oct 21, 2012 (gmt 0)

If everyone said "noarchive" then g### would simply stop honoring the directive


I don't think so -- if they ignored a hardcoded directive to "not archive content", and ignored it, they would open themselves up to lawsuits, (probably a giant class action).

graeme_p




msg:4510668
 6:27 am on Oct 22, 2012 (gmt 0)

The problem newspapers (globally, I have no idea whether Brazilian papers are better or worse) have is that a high proportion of news is available from multiple sources. If the newspapers pull out of Google News, other sources will replace them, or new sources will appear to fill in the gap.

Lame_Wolf




msg:4510791
 1:07 pm on Oct 22, 2012 (gmt 0)

It looks like the French are going to do a similar thing to Germany...
[dailymail.co.uk...]

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Local / Foo
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved