homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.198.148.191
register, free tools, login, search, subscribe, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Subscribe and Support WebmasterWorld
Home / Forums Index / Local / Foo
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL & lawman

Foo Forum

    
URL Shortening Service, tr.im, Will Keep Operating
engine




msg:3971360
 4:50 pm on Aug 13, 2009 (gmt 0)

URL Shortening Service, tr.im, Will Keep Operating [blog.tr.im]
We have restored tr.im, and re-opened its website. We have been absolutely overwhelmed by the popular response, and the countless public and private appeals I have received to keep tr.im alive.

We have answered those pleas. Nambu will keep tr.im operating going forward, indefinitely, while we continue to consider our options in regards to tr.imís future.

Earlier story
URL Shortener Tr.im to Shut Down [webmasterworld.com]

 

GaryK




msg:3971413
 6:18 pm on Aug 13, 2009 (gmt 0)

"We simply cannot find a way to justify continuing to work on it, or pay its network costs, which are not inconsequential," the post read.

I wonder what's changed since that line in their previous announcement?

arieng




msg:3971450
 7:04 pm on Aug 13, 2009 (gmt 0)

Link bait?

moTi




msg:3971494
 8:21 pm on Aug 13, 2009 (gmt 0)

before reporting a termination of a web service maybe the press should adhere to a waiting period after it has shut down to prevent such lame pr stunts.

vincevincevince




msg:3971600
 1:22 am on Aug 14, 2009 (gmt 0)

I would be interested in seeing the actual costs of running tr.im;

Mohamed




msg:3971601
 1:23 am on Aug 14, 2009 (gmt 0)

I think they want sell it and to prove its worth they should keep going.

JackThomspon




msg:3971960
 2:52 pm on Aug 14, 2009 (gmt 0)

I am sure the cost is not too high to run it. I was surprised that they announced it would be shutting down. Right away it felt like a marketing ploy. What about you guys..did you feel the same?

jackgordon




msg:3973299
 10:47 am on Aug 17, 2009 (gmt 0)

Won't the costs just be basic hosting/ server costs... maybe $50 a month? Whatever the cost, Surely they'd raise it from a simple advert on the homepage or a dontations box even!

brotherhood of LAN




msg:3973614
 7:16 pm on Aug 17, 2009 (gmt 0)

Costs can't be that high. Not much overhead in a longurl->hash->shorturl conversion.

Sending 3xx responses is light on bandwidth.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Local / Foo
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved