homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.166.113.249
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Home / Forums Index / Local / Foo
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL & lawman

Foo Forum

    
Why not Buy Google instead of Yahoo?
A Better Buy?
King_Fisher

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3589248 posted 5:29 am on Mar 2, 2008 (gmt 0)

As Google's stock keeps dropping in price, Maybe MSN should take a look at acquiring them,

I know it would never get by the Feds and who knows who holds the majority of the stock. But it would be a wild scenario.

The two behemoths rolled into one! Next stop world domination!...KF :o)

 

tedster

WebmasterWorld Senior Member tedster us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3589248 posted 12:32 pm on Mar 2, 2008 (gmt 0)

Are you a fan of horror movies ;)

Lord Majestic

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3589248 posted 12:40 pm on Mar 2, 2008 (gmt 0)

They can't do it even if capitalisation of Google drops to $1 - everyone seems to have forgotten about peculiar way shareholding is structured in Google - the founders have full control even though they don't have majority of shares. So buying 100% shares on the open market won't result in control of the company.

King_Fisher

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3589248 posted 7:32 pm on Mar 2, 2008 (gmt 0)

Good one Ted!...KF

eric8476

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3589248 posted 11:05 pm on Mar 16, 2008 (gmt 0)

That might go against better business practices but it what if google and mircosoft go head to head after the sale of yahoo check out [webmasterworld.com...]

Computers could end up being hardware with prompts to download OS from the internet.

raedthakur

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3589248 posted 6:17 am on Apr 2, 2008 (gmt 0)

why would buying 100% shares not give full control ?

PCInk

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3589248 posted 8:59 am on Apr 2, 2008 (gmt 0)

Owning majority shares does not give you full control of a company. What gives you the control is the contracts. Majority shareholders get full control by default if there are no contracts to explicitly say who has control.

raedthakur

5+ Year Member



 
Msg#: 3589248 posted 9:03 am on Apr 2, 2008 (gmt 0)

ohh so in Google's case the founders have a full control contract?

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Local / Foo
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved