| 7:09 pm on Feb 12, 2007 (gmt 0)|
|Webmaster practices as sign of dating quality. |
lol! I would never date a girl who used Webmaster practices as a signs of dating quality. How's that? ;)
|I would (probably) not date a guy who has an AdSense account. |
But, what if it were one of those 6-7 digit AdSense accounts?
P.S. I would never date a girl who didn't list their URI in their profile. Same goes for business relationships. ;)
| 7:25 pm on Feb 12, 2007 (gmt 0)|
So, what would you look for as a good sign
Non commercial webmasters perhaps :-)
| 7:57 pm on Feb 12, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Perhaps there must be some other important queries you might be making to guys before asking for a date except if he has adsense account or is expert in link making
| 8:06 pm on Feb 12, 2007 (gmt 0)|
|I've been burned by fraud too much to trust people in the AdSense program. |
Please explain this relationship. Are you trying to say that everyone with an AdSense account commits click fraud?
| 8:20 pm on Feb 12, 2007 (gmt 0)|
For me to date a webmistress she must have the following qualities.
First of all she must have a very short URL, so its easy to remember. Heaven forbid if I ever confuse her website with that of a previous webmistress I dated.
Second her pages have to load very fast, I do not like sitting around and waiting.
Finally her pages must be under 40k, no full pages for me :)
| 8:26 pm on Feb 12, 2007 (gmt 0)|
How about a guy who has a web site which includes information about kinky sexual activities?
Okay, perhaps not <g>
| 11:49 pm on Feb 12, 2007 (gmt 0)|
I like presentation as much as the next guy, but I can't stay interested for very long in girls who are all presentation and no content.
However, I am naturally drawn towards those girls who have a distinct style. (Not to mention a flexible structure).
| 12:47 am on Feb 13, 2007 (gmt 0)|
It's performance that counts.......
If a girl doesn't recognise that then she ain't worth having......
| 2:05 am on Feb 13, 2007 (gmt 0)|
I'd avoid 'one-trick-pony' websites, and be on the lookout for sites that do lots of things well. The perfect webmaster might be running a site that offers varying degrees of access, depending upon levels of user commitment or loyalty. ;-)
And no, I don't want to date Brett.
| 2:27 am on Feb 13, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Oh boy. This thread has the potential to go off the rails very quickly.
(Memo to self: no, do NOT follow that thought)
| 2:31 am on Feb 13, 2007 (gmt 0)|
| 4:49 am on Feb 13, 2007 (gmt 0)|
| 5:51 am on Feb 13, 2007 (gmt 0)|
* her own domain
* a title that ranks
* a certain maturity
* well developed
* quite accessible
* not too flashy
* doesn't require a script
* a style for every occasion
* looks good to all browsing by
* keyword selection gets an affirmative response
* affiliation proposals received with pleasure
* appropriate 301s to inhibit unwanted duplication
* prime content to ensure multiple conversions
* ecstatic site experience begets natural links of burning love
* no need to purchase links of doubtful desire
* ROI! ROI! ROI!
| 8:47 am on Feb 13, 2007 (gmt 0)|
|I would never date a girl who didn't list their URI in their profile. |
What would it matter? It would probably be someone else's keyword-rich, high ranking URI anyway.
If the source under her knickers validates, I'm asking her out. :-) But as usual, I will probably get bounced and returned undeliverable.
LOL I missed this . . . is your name, by any chance, George Costanza?
| 9:16 am on Feb 13, 2007 (gmt 0)|
|If the source under her knickers validates, I'm asking her out. :-) But as usual, I will probably get bounced and returned undeliverable. |
You might get red flagged, timing is of the essence
| 11:08 am on Feb 13, 2007 (gmt 0)|
I guess the URLs have to be clean, makes life easier for everyone.
| 3:07 pm on Feb 13, 2007 (gmt 0)|
|appropriate 301s to inhibit unwanted duplication |
You have forever infected my future view of mod_rewrite.
| 3:28 pm on Feb 13, 2007 (gmt 0)|
I have a lot of good friends that buy and sell links. However, we generally agree that mesothelioma is some sort of line we just won't cross. ;-)
| 1:23 am on Feb 14, 2007 (gmt 0)|
^Oh yes, that would be the worst. All that counter spam.
| 3:12 am on Feb 14, 2007 (gmt 0)|
iamlost pretty much summed it up. All I can add is that she not have a hit counter on her index page. There are some things I just don't want to know.
| 3:49 am on Feb 14, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Okay, let's get a little more intimate...
She will have to have her
<head> together. Since I'm a physical type, the <body> is next on the priority list. From there I'm going to be looking for semantics. Is she as pretty inside as she is outside? I'm definitely going to be checking out her
<form> at all times. That's just me, I'm attentive.
If she passes the above, I'm going to ask for her
<address>. At that point she has become the
<object> of my desire. I'm going to come on
<strong> and with lots of
<style>, that's just me.
<legend> in my own mind. ;)
Can you believe we're participating in this topic? :)
| 4:46 am on Feb 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
That is *sure* to get you an index=nofollow.
| 6:53 am on Feb 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
If she didn't like me, she could always "redirect" me to her sister or best friend ;)
| 12:41 pm on Feb 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Is the site appealing.
Then it's all about downtime and access.
| 12:53 pm on Feb 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
And if it's a guy, he has to have good uptime...
| 4:27 pm on Feb 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
She should also have a prominent <submit> button.
| 6:00 pm on Feb 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
and one of them magic buttons that send her away (X) when you have just about had enough of sucking in all that content and want to watch the tv.
| 6:34 pm on Feb 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
Of course we cannot forget...
This is for those severe situations where an error has occurred and needs to be forced into correction/agreement. :)
|That is *sure* to get you an rel="nofollow". |
lol! That's a good one.
| 6:50 pm on Feb 15, 2007 (gmt 0)|
This is what any female reading this thread is probably thinking :)
<strike>All males that posted</strike>
| This 35 message thread spans 2 pages: 35 (  2 ) > > |