homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.211.164.132
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member

Visit PubCon.com
Home / Forums Index / Browsers / Firefox Browser Usage and Support
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: incrediBILL

Firefox Browser Usage and Support Forum

    
Firefox 9.0 Claimed Up To 30 pct Faster
engine




msg:4400238
 6:30 pm on Dec 21, 2011 (gmt 0)

Firefox 9.0 Claimed Up To 30 pct Faster [blog.mozilla.com]
Firefox for Windows, Mac and Linux has new JavaScript enhancements that make Web browsing significantly faster. The latest update to Firefox includes Type Inference which boosts JavaScript performance and allow rich websites and Web apps with lots of pictures, videos, games and 3D graphics to load and run much faster. Type Inference is a feature of the SpiderMonkey JavaScript engine that integrates with the JaegerMonkey JIT compiler to provide analysis and help generate more efficient code. Firefox with Type Inference is up to 30% speedier on JavaScript benchmarks like Kraken and V8.

[mozilla.org...]

 

GaryK




msg:4400383
 4:51 am on Dec 22, 2011 (gmt 0)

Version 9.0.1 was just released [ghacks.net] a few hours ago.

SEOPTI




msg:4400387
 5:41 am on Dec 22, 2011 (gmt 0)

FF sold out to Google for 100M after first choosing Bing for a short time, now they can afford making the browser faster.

grelmar




msg:4400391
 6:15 am on Dec 22, 2011 (gmt 0)

FF sold out to Google for 100M after first choosing Bing for a short time, now they can afford making the browser faster.


More like Mozilla put Google's feet to the coals by threatening to set Bing as the default search engine until Google coughed up the $$ that Mozilla wanted.

At this exact moment in history, Mozilla is in a strong position to play spoiler in the search market. Microsoft/Bing would pay a hefty fee for the additional search share that would accrue from being the default Mozilla search engine. Google can't afford to take the black eye that would result from the lost search share, with the extra bruising from being seen dumping sponsorship of a darling of the open source community.

All FF has to do is maintain a 20-30% market share, and they will get to continue to play spoiler, and extract a ransom from Google or Bing once every three years.

Nice business model for a "Non-Profit".

qcloud




msg:4400393
 6:43 am on Dec 22, 2011 (gmt 0)

Well said grelmar. Could not agree more. But at the rate Chrome' usage percentage is rising, may be google won't have to worry about such factors in 3-4 years.

weeks




msg:4400545
 4:04 pm on Dec 22, 2011 (gmt 0)

I agree with all that is said here.

It was likely a fun chat. Mozilla likely knows exactly how much traffic Firefox is sending to Google, and they likely have a very good idea of how much it is worth to Google. And you know Google has the exact number. So, the only discussion was, "How much do we lose from not being the default?" I wonder if Google's guys said, like every webmaster hears from their clients, "We just can't afford to pay more than x." Think they said that?

Meanwhile....ya gotta admire Apple keeping Safari or only browsers willing to pay for the honor (using Safari as the base) on their iPad. Ol' Safari's share of the user market, while still small, has almost tripled in the last three years.

Sgt_Kickaxe




msg:4400863
 1:15 pm on Dec 23, 2011 (gmt 0)

I like Firefox though I remove the google toolbar immediately and default the search box to wikipedia while deleting the google search box completely.

The browser still "calls home" to many places when you use it, sending google and microsoft data about how you use various features/sites, but it looks like it does so less often now.

HOWEVER - a fix I had used on my computer to disable Internet Explorer no longer works. I cannot set IE to use the LAN setting of 0.0.0.0 anymore since microsoft features will now use firefox instead if IE is unavailable... yuck.

I have nothing to hide but nobody asked me and I didn't ok for ANY information to leave my computer withou my express consent... ya know?

Is there ANY current browser available, besides old IE6, that doesn't call home to various places with various data by default?

Leosghost




msg:4400868
 1:25 pm on Dec 23, 2011 (gmt 0)

Iron ?
[srware.net...]

dstiles




msg:4401039
 10:22 pm on Dec 23, 2011 (gmt 0)

Sgt_Kickaxe - how did you determine the "calls home" thing?

And do you actually mean info is sent back to google / MS about how you are browsing?

Using Firefox here on Linux and Windows.

SEOPTI




msg:4401289
 3:54 am on Dec 25, 2011 (gmt 0)

Sorry I was wrong, the agreement is 300M/year. This way Chrome will win more and more market share and in a few years FF will be history.

I believe some people at Moz. enjoy a luxurious lifestyle at the top of the food chain until they sell out FF market share completely ;)

briangreenberg




msg:4401427
 2:34 am on Dec 26, 2011 (gmt 0)

FF is still too slow. Chrome is quicker and more stable.

nefitco




msg:4402224
 5:53 pm on Dec 29, 2011 (gmt 0)

I have tried to hang in there with Chrome but after countless hangs and "Oh, snaps!" and re-installs I've dumped Chrome for FF 9.0 which has been performing flawlessly.

FF has really ramped up their effort since 3.6. Congratulations!

Seb7




msg:4402310
 3:33 am on Dec 30, 2011 (gmt 0)

I moved to Chrome because FF has been too buggy this year.

Is everyone else finding FF 9.0 stable?

dstiles




msg:4402485
 10:02 pm on Dec 30, 2011 (gmt 0)

No problem with extensive use of FF since before 3.6. This is on Linux Ubuntu (me) and Windows 2000 (wife). My own use is typically 6 windows open with about 50+ tabs between them.

I would never use chrome because a) it has a lot of exploitable flaws in it and b) it's google, which means a privacy issue at the very least.

Fotiman




msg:4402508
 12:29 am on Dec 31, 2011 (gmt 0)

*sigh*

First, Chrome does not have a lot of "exploitable flaws" in it. In fact, recent security reports found that Chrome's sandboxing and plug-in security make it more secure than Firefox and IE.

Second, assuming that because it's Google means it's a privacy issue is just that... an assumption. This is the same age old tin-foil-hat-wearing argument that keeps being made without ANY data to support it. I wish people would stop making such statements without providing even a speck of supporting data. Otherwise, it's just silly rumors.

To get back on topic, though, I have not yet tried the latest FF. I keep meaning to give it another look, but I stopped using it a while ago because it just seemed so slow. I still use it for development purposes (you can't beat Firebug), but it's not the browser I use for day-to-day web browsing.

dstiles




msg:4402724
 9:33 pm on Dec 31, 2011 (gmt 0)

"Recent security reports" having bneen compiled by "Google-commisioned research". Webkit has flaws. That's it.

It is known that google traces browsing habits using whatever means they can. I always block GA and similar and I shudder every time I have to pass private data to someone using gmail!

Fotiman




msg:4402747
 2:20 am on Jan 1, 2012 (gmt 0)

Again, feel free to trust rumors over actual data.

*walks away from discussion, sans-tin-foil-hat*

tictoc




msg:4403111
 7:18 am on Jan 3, 2012 (gmt 0)

I use IE, FF, and Chrome. Chrome is good for some things while Firefox for some. Don't see that big of a difference in the new version though...

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  
 

Home / Forums Index / Browsers / Firefox Browser Usage and Support
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved