bwnbwn
msg:4392234 | 10:54 pm on Nov 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
The little rich billionaire knew exactly what they were doing. "stewards of this community and their trust" please get me on a hill sh-- getting real deep.
|
tangor
msg:4392239 | 10:59 pm on Nov 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
FB will be reminded bi-annually... for the next 20 years as their privacy compliance is audited.
|
albo
msg:4392253 | 11:20 pm on Nov 29, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Right, bwnbwn. "Trust me. I'm a good steward." (a.k.a., "Don't be evil.") ...on knees, hands raised, "yes, brother, I believe!"
|
Bewenched
msg:4392318 | 3:40 am on Nov 30, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Yup, he knew exactly what he was doing.
Nice to be a billionaire on a stolen idea and get away with giving out private information to any app that wanted it.
|
bill
msg:4392338 | 5:42 am on Nov 30, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Other headlines are proclaiming that FB must make future privacy changes opt-in...but there are already huge holes in the structure of this deal that will probably allow FB to continue on in the same way without changing much of anything.
|
pp46
msg:4392414 | 11:25 am on Nov 30, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Well now what would you say about Googles Social Network +1
attitude on this, seeing as they allready have everybodys data already.
I am not a keen user on Social Networking
but as a webmaster I see its utilities
seems to me that +1 has more potential as they stick the little button right there in the serps
to get comments on a site
F Book can't do that ..
|
Seb7
msg:4394300 | 9:18 am on Dec 5, 2011 (gmt 0) |
Yep, seen first hand how apps have got way too much information, not sure if Facebook volunteered it or if it was crowbar'd out.
Im always checking what the audience is when posting now. I'm likely the new custom friends
|
|
