| ICANN To Face Objections From Governments Over New Net Addresses
|
engine

msg:4520717 | 12:59 pm on Nov 20, 2012 (gmt 0) | Some countries have already registered individual complaints, but the latest move represents collective concerns. Objections raised by the panel - the Government Advisory Committee (Gac) - will not be binding on net address regulator Icann (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), but the organisation must produce "well reasoned arguments" if it decides to deny any request. |
|
|
Marshall

msg:4520789 | 4:32 pm on Nov 20, 2012 (gmt 0) | No matter what is decided, you are not going to make everyone happy. I think it is possible to offend everyone to some degree with the vast number of gTLD's suggested plus increase abuse and misrepresentation. And, of course, the conflict of interests with things like Google controlling .search. And quite frankly, who is going to remember all those gTLD's as many are niche. One effect I see is the cost of .com's, especially established ones, will sky rocket. Marshall
|
swa66

msg:4520807 | 5:19 pm on Nov 20, 2012 (gmt 0) | More TLDs means more money for ICANN, registries and registrars. And probably also for squatters etc. Less money for all the rest of us needing to protect our names in many more TLDs. So for all I care: there are plenty already and unless a country splits up: stop making new ones!
|
engine

msg:4521043 | 11:22 am on Nov 21, 2012 (gmt 0) | The objections are now in, for those that want to see them. The panel - known as the Government Advisory Committee (Gac) - has published its "early warning" list on the web to give applicants a chance to address its concerns or choose to withdraw their submission and reclaim 80% of their $185,000 (£116,300) application fee. New internet name objections filed by government panel [bbc.co.uk] |
| https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/GAC+Early+Warnings The organisations and suffixes referred to on the list included: Amazon for its applications for .app, .book, .movie, .game and .mail among others. Google for .search, .cloud and .gmbh (a reference to a type of limited German company). Johnson & Johnson for .baby. L'Oreal for .beauty, .hair, .makeup, .salon and .skin. The Weather Channel for .weather. Symantec for .antivirus. eHow publisher, Demand Media, for .army, .airforce, .engineer and .green. |
|
|
lucy24

msg:4521211 | 7:18 pm on Nov 21, 2012 (gmt 0) | I should hope so. People would scream bloody murder if an individual company tried to get exclusive rights to dot co(m). Or .ltd or .llc or .inc
|
phranque

msg:4521377 | 2:01 am on Nov 22, 2012 (gmt 0) | google IS an individual company.
|
lucy24

msg:4521382 | 2:39 am on Nov 22, 2012 (gmt 0) | Er, yeah. That was my point.
|
|
|