| This 32 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 32 ( 1 [2] ) | |
| ICANN Expected to Approve Dot X X X gTLD
Move may happen this Friday |
Demaestro
msg:4158818 | 9:24 pm on Jun 24, 2010 (gmt 0) |
[news.search.yahoo.com...]
| (ICANN) is expected to give the go-ahead on Friday for the creation of a .X X X suffix for websites with Pron-ographic content, company officials indicated on Thursday. |
|
I hope the next step is forcing pron to these extensions. Although I am not sure that would ever happen or is even possible to enforce.
| allow websites with sexually explicit content to start using the suffix on a voluntary basis |
|
It would make parental controls so much easier. [edited by: Webwork at 12:00 pm (utc) on Jun 25, 2010]
[edit reason] Tidying up system issues in order to clarify subject [/edit]
|
tigger
msg:4160131 | 11:36 am on Jun 27, 2010 (gmt 0) |
| It's interesting that Icann (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) is setting up a #*$!-only internet domain, where addresses will have the suffix #*$! rather than www. |
|
well least we have the guardian to clear things up regarding the ridiculous x x x - some nice comments at the bottom
x x x . idiotpress.com
[guardian.co.uk ]
|
walkman
msg:4160328 | 7:53 pm on Jun 27, 2010 (gmt 0) |
No one but the new regi$trar and ICAAN wants this. Sites are very well classified by software, just very few homes use them.
|
| This 32 message thread spans 2 pages: < < 32 ( 1 [2] ) |
|
|
|
