homepage Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from
register, free tools, login, search, pro membership, help, library, announcements, recent posts, open posts,
Become a Pro Member
Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Domain Names
Forum Library, Charter, Moderators: buckworks & webwork

Domain Names Forum

Domain squatting and common law trademark

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

Msg#: 3240923 posted 5:45 pm on Feb 2, 2007 (gmt 0)

Okay, making it clear, I know all of you (with the exception of a mod) are not lawyers and I can't take any advice as gospal and all that... blah, blah, blah.

Anyway, I was wondering if anyone had heard of a successful case where a domain name was taken away from a squatter based on common law trademark?

I have a client whose company and company name is 100 years old, but has never been registered federally. It does fall under common law trademark, I believe. Anyhoo, the plural of their name (which actually is probably what most people type) was registered awhile back by a rather notorious squatter and I have done all the offers to buy and what not to no avail. They won't even give me a huge price to pay for the domain.

Is there a case where a common law trademark succeded in getting a domain away from the squatter?



10+ Year Member

Msg#: 3240923 posted 10:18 pm on Feb 2, 2007 (gmt 0)

I think I've seen quite a few of those in the WIPO decisions - check out case # D2003-0520, for example.


WebmasterWorld Administrator webwork us a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

Msg#: 3240923 posted 2:19 pm on Feb 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

"Passing off" or trading off - in other words profiting by (somewhat directly and specifically) exploiting your client's business name might give you some legs for pressing a claim. It might not be purely a 'trademark claim' but another form of State law claim. I'd focus on whether there is any evidence that the domain holder is targeting your client's (potential) business clientele.

Might be time for the old fashioned lawyer letter. At the very least it may cause the domain holder to remove any misleading or mis-directing links. Kill the profit (arising from any confusion or exploitation) and you may kill the domain holder's interest in keeping the domain.

If your client's business name is a very generalized or generic name it might make things a bit more problematic.


10+ Year Member

Msg#: 3240923 posted 3:42 pm on Feb 5, 2007 (gmt 0)

OK, disclaimer first: I'm not a lawyer, and you should consult one. As they say, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, so here goes:

Prior usage is everything in trademark law, whether the name has been formally registered or not. 100 years of use in interstate commerce would likely impart a lot of strength. On the other hand, if the mark is merely descriptive or generic, it could be weak. If the name is entirely fanciful, and/or unique enough - and especially if the average user could derive little clue about what the company actually does or sells from its name alone (eg: Amazon, eBay, Yahoo, Google, Kodak, Exxon) it's considered a much stronger mark.

There's also a fundamental ancient legal principle called Laches. In a nutshell, if your client has rights of ownership in this trademark and does nothing to enforce its rights against parasites and pests, those rights can lapse away, evaporate. Especially if it can be proven that you were aware of those junior users, and it can, because apparently you two have already exchanged communications about the matter. Trademark holders are legally bound to pursue each and every illegitimate user of their marks. Let the stalemate go on for a year or two or three, and you might find yourself at a big disadvantage, and holding a considerably weakened mark.

So yeah - you ought to talk to an attorney, and soon.


WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member

Msg#: 3240923 posted 5:08 am on Feb 6, 2007 (gmt 0)

Have a look around [wipo.int...]
I think you'll find that you're in a very strong position.

Global Options:
 top home search open messages active posts  

Home / Forums Index / WebmasterWorld / Domain Names
rss feed

All trademarks and copyrights held by respective owners. Member comments are owned by the poster.
Home ¦ Free Tools ¦ Terms of Service ¦ Privacy Policy ¦ Report Problem ¦ About ¦ Library ¦ Newsletter
WebmasterWorld is a Developer Shed Community owned by Jim Boykin.
© Webmaster World 1996-2014 all rights reserved