| 11:55 pm on Aug 27, 2006 (gmt 0)|
heartily seconded ..thanks George ..
( actually raises glass of bushmills in toast to screen )
| 12:42 am on Aug 28, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Thanks. Kudos to everyone who took the time to do the reading on this issue and to post comments. The last things folks want to waste time on during the summer is reading ICANN legalese. Fortunately a lot of domain owners and webmasters have looked a few moves ahead and recognized that a mistake in contracts and policy today can lead to "checkmate" in the future.
| 3:00 am on Aug 29, 2006 (gmt 0)|
In the various places I found this issue being discussed, it was apparently due to a thread started by George Kirikos.
At last count, there were over 300 messages posted today. A total of more than 550 in each of the three ICANN forums, with one breaking the 600 mark. The bulk of these have been since GeorgeK posted his message on Friday.
<KNIGHT RIDER THEME>
We should all remember this in the future whenever we wonder if our vote will matter, if our efforts will make a difference. One man can make a difference!
</KNIGHT RIDER THEME>
| 3:51 am on Aug 29, 2006 (gmt 0)|
|We should all remember this in the future whenever we wonder if our vote will matter, if our efforts will make a difference. One man can make a difference! |
I agree! Thank you George for making the post and making us aware of what was going on.
Cheers to you George! And to webwork for doing an awesome job as moderator of this forum and for you ccDan for all the legwork and helpful posts you made today!
Thanks everyone who posted!
| 1:05 pm on Aug 29, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Great work George. Really appreciate it
| 5:08 pm on Aug 29, 2006 (gmt 0)|
Yes. Good work George.
All though this fight is long from over. There is at least a very strong public record of dissent.
| 3:57 pm on Sep 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
| 4:05 pm on Sep 1, 2006 (gmt 0)|
:) You are too kind.
If folks want to follow through, writing to the US Department of Justice might be a logical next step: